this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
640 points (94.4% liked)

politics

21845 readers
3532 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former vice presidential nominee Tim Walz criticized Trump for economic chaos while taking personal responsibility for the situation during an MSNBC interview.

"We wouldn't be in this mess if we'd have won the election — and we didn't," Walz told Chris Hayes. He called Trump the "worst possible business executive" and praised the Wall Street Journal's editorial criticizing Trump's tariff war.

Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump. Recently, he acknowledged a leadership void in the Democratic Party and admitted spending too much time combatting Trump's false claims about immigrants.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The UN says its genocide. The icc says it's close enough to genocide for the Israeli government to be arrested, every non Israeli historian with a specialty in genocide says its genocide.

And yes, the questions have been "do you support the governments actions against Gaza and the Palestinian people", and yes those actions are known to be genocide by the people that carried them out, i.e. the general public in Israel thanks to mandatory IDF service.

There used to be 2 million people in Gaza. There's now at most 1.2 million by most outside estimates. Deaths stopped being counted when all the hospitals, and that's not an exaggeration, were bombed in Gaza. So no one has been counting the dead.

You don't get to say Ukraine has it worse, because they don't. Objectively. No part of their experience is pleasant, but it's simply incomparably better.

The UN says its genocide. The ICC says it’s close enough to genocide for the Israeli government to be arrested, every non Israeli historian with a specialty in genocide says its genocide.

IDK about the UN personally, because people have only ever sent me articles about the UN discussion how it "could be genocide" rather than how it is, or they simply point to UN law and go "look it meets the broad definition they supplied, that hasn't been legally scrutinized yet" If they do have an official statement on it, then i guess i just haven't seen it until now, because I'm not aware of one. The ICC specifically, I'm aware has arrest warrants for various war crimes, genocide is not listed among any of them, and AFAIK has not been attached since then, could be wrong on that one though, IK a lot of people point to the ICJ, but the ICJ literally refutes that claim themselves, they have stated that it could be "subject to conditions that would create a genocide" which is a rough paraphrasing, but as far as i know that's the most official statement they've made.

Sort of irrelevant, but another question I've been curious about is how many countries actually care enough to call it genocide, and i think that's up to two now? South Africa, obviously, and i think turkey? I'd have to check, both consider it a genocide. I don't know about any other countries, it's kind of an arcane thing to search for anyway. I know a lot of members of parliament have stated their concern, but those are representatives, and they can say basically anything.

And yes, the questions have been “do you support the governments actions against Gaza and the Palestinian people”,

ah interesting, so the question wasn't literally "is this genocide" and to be fair, i was being a little harsh on that one, but i think it's fair given the extent of the accusation being levied. Realistically, this is because both countries seem to hate each other, and haven't stopped hating each other for about 70 years now. Last i checked the middle east generally isn't very kind about these sorts of spats, they usually tend to do what they're doing right now. At least, in recent history, among recent conflicts.

There used to be 2 million people in Gaza. There’s now at most 1.2 million by most outside estimates. Deaths stopped being counted when all the hospitals, and that’s not an exaggeration, were bombed in Gaza. So no one has been counting the dead.

this is definitely a huge problem, frankly not sure why this is even a thing that's happening (people not being allowed to leave, that's a pretty substantial problem) it's extremely difficult to justify that kind of action, and i don't want to say it's expected, but given the length of the conflict, and the history behind it, I'm hesitant to say it's also unexpected. Palestine hasn't exactly been the most cordial negotiator throughout this, and neither has Israel. It's sort of like the two worst people in the world, having a stand off. It's just not going to end well.

You don’t get to say Ukraine has it worse, because they don’t. Objectively. No part of their experience is pleasant, but it’s simply incomparably better.

a lot of it is definitely better, but a lot of it is also very similar. It's just interesting to me that so many people seem to care so deeply about the Palestine issue, but barely anybody seems to even think about Ukraine at all these days. There are or were, maybe all of them were bots lmao, that seemed to be so heavily indebted into the side of Palestine that I'm not sure how they managed to be a functional person outside of that belief. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to tell you that a one state solution is simply, not going to work. Two state isn't perfect, but it's certainly better. Arguably the best possible result.