this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
391 points (98.8% liked)

politics

21143 readers
4733 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump is upset after King Charles warmly welcomed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at Sandringham, making Trump’s own state visit invitation seem “less special.”

Trump’s allies allegedly asked the British government to intervene, but officials stated the king makes his own decisions.

Relations may also be strained by Trump’s criticism of Canada, where Charles remains head of state.

The U.K. government denied tensions, reaffirming strong U.S.-U.K. ties.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Hahahaha, "The King makes his own decisions..."

In their constitutional system, I'm not believing that for a hot second.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 39 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Sandringham is one of the King’s private residences. So who he chooses to invite there and how they are received is up to him.

A state visit is commissioned by the government and the King has no choice in who is invited or how they are received.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The one thing Trumpism should have taught y'all is that all those "technically, yes, it's literally your government" royal/executive powers are actual powers when someone has the will to act like they believe it themselves and a certain baseline of support.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

And the one thing Oliver Cromwell should have taught you all is that when you set clear precedent for what happens when the head of state takes the piss, it doesn’t tend to reoccur.

American politics is built around worshipping the cult of the presidency, and whipping the office holders into shape has been repeatedly rejected on the basis of “harming the dignity of the office”.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

One of the most vilified men in English history? That Cromwell? The one people remember as a butcher, but not quite what he was rebelling over?

I'd find that impressive regardless if it wasn't for the fact that 40% of Brits don't even know his name.

https://yougov.co.uk/society/articles/51496-who-are-the-most-and-least-popular-kings-and-queens-of-england-and-britain

Just lol @ your second paragraph. The cult is for dead presidents, you silly peasant.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

You might look up what he did to a King who pushed things too far. Or whatever.

One of the major arguments against impeaching Clinton was that it would harm the prestige of the office. The same was used as an argument not to continue prosecution of Nixon. Both were alive at the time.