News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
The Left in the US would so much rather die on the hill of perceived moral superiority than achieve any of their goals. And, thus, here we are.
And centrists will accept any policy as long as it's to their right.
You don't know what you're talking about.
You say that to anyone to your left who doesn't jump with joy at the latest betrayal of marginalized groups.
I say that to anyone who doesn't know what they're talking about.
You arrogantly say it to anyone to your left.
That's not true. You don't know what you're talking about. Stop. Just stop.
Don't you have a republican to capitulate to?
No, dingus, I don't.
Oh, that's why you're so cranky. Here you are gaslighting and abusing someone to your left and there's not even a chance that you'll get headpats from republicans for doing it.
How do you know that you're to my left? You don't know me. What makes you so far left, anyway? Are you a Marxist, anarchist? What? You wanna gate keep the left, let's do it. Give me your specific socioeconomic, sociopolitical ideal, and details about how you think it can be achieved. I'm dying to hear about your grand plan to change the world and usher in utopia. Come on, we're all waiting for you. The future of humanity is in your hands, your plan had better be good.
I don't side with charlie kirk regarding trans people, for one. Discussion's about trans people.
If I dare to disagree with you and charlie kirk, I need to have a solution for every last one of the world's ills? Seems like a pretty high bar to clear just to be to your left regarding trans people.
When did I even once mention trans people?
When did I even once mention Charlie Kirk?
Is that all you think the Left is? Trans issues? There's nothing more to the Left than matters pertaining to trans people? You do realize that there are many billions of people on the planet who are not trans, and that their concerns matter as well?
I think you may be in the wrong thread, then.
I think that's what this thread is about.
The thread is about trans people. You're just trying to deflect.
Such as your lord and savior charlie kirk.
I'm not the one deflecting. You never answered my question: should the concerns of non-trans people also matter to the Left?
Yes, this thread is about trans issues, specifically the question of whether or not trans women should be allowed to participate in women's sports. Do you realize how privileged you have to be for that to be a major concern? Poverty, destitution, illness, these are problems that millions of people face everyday, yet you won't even acknowledge them because "that's not what this thread is about." You're no Leftist.
I'm sure they matter to you. Particularly the concerns of charlie kirk and his bestie gavin newsom.
I know enough trans people so it's personal, but it also speaks to a pattern of behavior within the centrist wing of the democratic party. Trans athletes are just the most recent group that democrats have thrown under the bus for the unmitigated delight of hearing the thumping sounds.
And your wing of the party has made it crystal clear that they are uninterested in helping anyone poorer than the "good billionaires" they toady up to.
They do. The question is: do they matter to you?
I don't know why you keep bringing up Charlie Kirk. I know next to nothing about him, I don't listen to him. I don't know, or care what he thinks about, well, much of anything, really.
It's not my wing of the party. I don't have a party, which is why I said I wanted to build a new Leftist movement: one that is interested in the concerns of the working class people. But, what folks like you don't understand, is that most working class people are not concerned about whether or not trans women are allowed to participate in women's sports. They are concerned about paying their rent, feeding their families, affording medical care, and other day-to-day, material issues. I choose to focus on those issues. You can focus on whatever you want, I don't care. My new Leftist movement won't include people like you, because you're not helping anyone, and I don't think you care to. You would accept widespread harm, so long as you could go on performing as a social justice advocate.
I have nothing more to say to you. I'm really not interested in reading another one of your vapid, banal responses about Charlie Kirk, or whatever other nonsense you might come up with. I'm going to go actually try to make the world a better place.
Because he was in the article. You read the article, right?
You're pretty angry for someone who doesn't care.
I think we can help people without throwing vulnerable minorities under the bus like you advocate for. The democratic party does that plenty already, and I have no doubt that once you've stripped support for trans people, you'll find some other group to advocate throwing under the bus instead of trying to do anything about poverty.
That’s part of why trump got elected lol. Rather than trying to fix the issues while retaining some level of government, some people were like “let’s have a brutal authoritarian dictatorship and change things for the worse. That will show democrats!” Meanwhile nobody votes in the primaries or their local elections
It's asinine, and that's why we need a new Left in the US: a Left of people who actually want to build a society in which the highest possible health and well being is achieved for the largest possible number of people, and who are willing and able to learn and adapt, to find the most effective methods for achieving said society, even if it means compromising and being pragmatic. A Left that is measured by results, rather than performative social justice advocacy.
I find it so hard to have good messaging on this topic because we first have to convince half this country that helping others is a virtue not a weakness. How do we convince a deeply selfish population that helping neighbors and keeping our nation healthy and educated are not “communist plots to make everyone poor” but just basics of a successful society. I can argue politics all day but once someone thinks empathy is a weakness or a sin, I just don’t know what to say anymore. We need a fundamental societal shift and that has to start locally I think.
It is a significant challenge. We absolutely do need to change the culture, and I think that is best achieved at the local level. I think it's a dead end trying to change the culture from the top down, I think we will have much more success building from the bottom up. But, that will require being heavily involved in our communities. That is a tricky proposition for many of us, because some of us live in pretty conservative, even reactionary communities. There's no easy answers here.
One possibility is for leftists to all move to the same state or states, to concentrate our power, to make us less diffuse and spread out. That's a pretty drastic plan, and probably not feasible for a lot of people, but it's one possibility, I suppose.
We should worry about the Right after we get the Left into some semblance of coherence and rationality. Liberals and Leftists should be natural allies against the fascists. Instead we got the Leftists knifing the Liberals in the back this election.
That might be fixable. Compromise between Left and Liberals is plausible. The Right, on the other hand, is not at all tethered to reality. There is no reasoning or compromise with them. They are in full-on batshit wackadoodle land. Addressing them will require something a lot more radical than "convincing".
So you're going to punch left until they agree with your bigotry and never get around to punching right.
Currently? As though it's not the only thing you do.
Well lemmy is a hornets nest of particularly stupid leftists, so yeah, that's a big part of what I do on this site specifically
You think anyone to your left is stupid and admire everyone to your right.
Abuse is the centrist substitute for defensible ideas.
Not anyone to my left. Just anyone dumb enough to enable fascism by rejecting an alliance (even of convenience!) with liberals.
So anyone who doesn't mindlessly fall in line and support everything you do.
You don't want an alliance. You want servility. I get why you're so frustrated. You don't see why servility isn't as easy for everyone else as it is for you.
And now we're at the part where you start making up shit and claiming I say it. Cool cool cool. I think it's nice we usually get 2 or 3 honest exchanges in before you remember your propaganda mission. I've missed that.
You've been lobbing abuse this entire conversation.
You have nothing good to say about anyone to your left, and nothing but defense of anti-trans hate.
Article isn't about the Gaza genocide. But it is nice of you to admit that you literally want to personally strangle every baby in Palestine. Not that you were being subtle about it before.