this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
4267 points (98.6% liked)

Games

37497 readers
2091 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They're entirely cosmetic in Valve games as far as I'm aware

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

The argument of cosmetic only microtransactions is also a bit of a weak one because it's the sort of content that would usually just be in the base game, unlockable via gameplay or tied to cheat codes. At least this used to be the case.

Cosmetic only is still better than other types but it's still a case of the lesser of two evils.

[–] dfc09@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Yeah, the only reason anybody says that is because we're so desensitized by pay-to-win mechanics and games being released half finished with day 1 dlc to fill the gaps, so we say "at least it's better than that"

Remember horse armor? I bet there's plenty of video games out now with cosmetic horse armor for sale.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

We game for what we game for. Some people game for the cosmetics. They are selling what consumers buy. I'm not saying it's right. But if they keep buying why wouldn't they sell it?

[–] Nefyedardu@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What's wrong with it? Literally every single gameplay-related item in both Dota and CSGO are free. 100%, no strings attached. You can experience the entire game and what it has to offer without spending a dime. At some point you have to charge for something. These companies aren't making these game out of charity, they are in fact businesses. You can criticize the methods they use to push them (lootboxes, BP, etc) but I don't see a problem with the concept.

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Cosmetic-only microtransactions in Free to Play games are absolutely fine, and should be encouraged. Those games wouldn’t exist without them.

In paid games it’s a different matter though, sure.

[–] eliza_stats@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I like the way Grinding Gear does it with POE, a FTP game supported by cosmetic-only micro transactions. The stash tabs are the closest thing to "pay to win".

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I like Valve but fuck those loot boxes, their tolerance of gambling, and screw that bs excuse of "it's only cosmetic" because we know it's not and it preys on the same insecurities and uses the same psychological tools to maximize profits using addiction.