this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
16 points (94.4% liked)

askchapo

22888 readers
1 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
replaceable@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
Sulv@hexbear.net
16
AI Summaries of Articles (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 month ago by Antiwork@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Most people do not read the article link that's posted. So I put an AI summary of the link as a comment, but as a spoiler so if you don't want to engage with it you don't have to and also the full article so people can more accessibly read the article. Also as a spoiler so it doesn't take up a full page of a comment. It got removed by a mod as AI slop.

I could use AI on a headline and you would never know the difference. I could just say it's my own summary also probably wouldn't know the difference. Punishing people for being transparent about using LLMs who are not forcing the reader to engage with them is a net positive and a good practice to teach. The opposite is people still use them and just pretend they aren't.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Antiwork@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

My point is that trying to block LLMs is playing a wack a mole. Acknowledging their presence and putting some guide rails seem to be a better way to go about it, but the community obviously disagrees with me and I'm fine with that. Not a big deal to me at all.

It's not a very compelling argument. I can run an llm on my device as done for this summary. How much energy do people waste on erroneous things that is causing climate catastrophe.

Gamers used 34TWh of energy almost a decade ago. Probably way higher now. But yet we have a community for gamers on this site. Do they not care about the climate disaster they're adding to every year? We could do this with almost anything and everything that uses electricity that people learn from or enjoy using.

[–] blight@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

the only way you can get away from this nonsense was to make a statement that the people in power were the same people who voted against this and they were not even elected to office in any form of government or anything other then a bunch that is a lie and you know what you’re doing to the right to be a good thing for the country is the one that has done it all you can say that you don’t have a problem and you don’t care what anyone thinks you have to do with the rest and i don’t care about it so i just don’t want you being upset or upset about anything else and you have no one to talk about that i just don’t care about your feelings i do not want it i just don’t like it i just wanted your opinions on this is what you do what i do not have any other than what i do what you do not care what people do not have a problem and that’s it is what you don’t want it doesn’t matter what i do i do whatever you do what you’re the one thing