this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
298 points (97.2% liked)
Not The Onion
13654 readers
568 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, it's just going to suck for humans for a few million years, some endangered species are going to go extinct, but life will definitely continue.
Nope, not like that either. The science shows it’s gonna destroy human habitats along the coastline, if no mitigating steps are taken such as they have been in the netherlands and new orleans (dikes to hold back rising sea levels).
That’s about it for the negative effects.
On the positive side, there’s going to be greater crop yield per acre, and fewer deaths from cold.
Increasing temperatures will lead to increased human deaths due to high heat, far more than the reduction in cold deaths.
Crop yield per acre is not going to increase. What are you basing this off, the general notion that plants need CO2 for photosynthesis, so more CO2 equals more growth? Because the reality is that crop yield looks likely to decrease, because of ecosystem disruption
Intensely dumb human.