this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
60 points (98.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13949 readers
652 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] booty@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (42 children)

s a race to the bottom for whoever can dredge the dumbest and most incoherent takes riddled with slurs on the Steam forums or whatever garbage hole.

Is this what the dunk tank was before rule 8? Is that typically the kind of content removed under rule 8? Or is it just normal dunk tank content which would be allowed if the number next to the text was higher? Be honest.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago (34 children)

Yes, absolutely. Dunk tank content removed under rule 8 (and even before it was formalised) is always some random irrelevant take posted by a nobody with no platform, of which there are literally hundreds of millions on the internet. I think the most notable posting we've ever even had to actually think about whether rule 8 applies is some small time twitch streamer with under 1000 followers who posted something racist on twitter.

The goal of rule 8 is and has always been to limit the absolute dogshit takes that random bluesky accounts nobody's heard of, shitty YouTube commenters, or bad Facebook posts made by some random guy you used to work with 5 years ago.

The intention is to allow for the picking apart of posts made by people with a reasonably large platform or even vague association with the levers of power, without having to wade an endless supply of boring bad takes from nobodies in order to find something worth dunking on.

The rule has been explained multiple times, your disagreement with the rule does not make it unclear.

[–] booty@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (10 children)

The intention is to allow for the picking apart of posts made by people with a reasonably large platform or even vague association with the levers of power,

Why exactly does posting have to be praxis and how is making fun of an Elon Musk tweet praxis, im begging you to explain this

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

Posting isn't praxis, nor does it need to be. You can quit JAQing off and "begging for an explanation" now.

It's pretty clear at this point that no amount of explanation is going to be sufficient for you given the way you've continued to antagonize both moderators and everyone else who has tried to clarify the situation to you in this and previous threads.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)