I've provided more facts to support my claim than you have for yours. I've provided nothing, whereas you have actively lied about the nothing you've brought forth. I don't need to prove anything to you.
Not that I could, conservatives don't think anyway, and you can't logic someone out of a position they felt their way into.
Those are not facts. You are wrong. Nice try though.
And here lies my point. A vast majority of people don't think its hate speech. And a vast majority of people believe free speech supersedes hate speech.
Actually, a vast majority of people don't support being a shitbag to other people. You're confusing popular sentiment with the whims of the conservative elite. If you don't just hide in right wing echo chambers all the time you might be surprised to find out how unpopular your terrible views are.
With practice, and with help from her deep medical knowledge
Depends on my mood somewhat, but I definitely have a sweet tooth. I try to be good and only keep healthy sweet snacks like apples and sugar snap peas in the house, but I definitely fold to some peanut butter granola or gummy candies or something like that
Things don't change very often tbh. Most of the Mental Health Listings were updated in 2017 I wanna say, but if someone doesn't meet those criteria I don't believe the other rules have been updated in quite some time.
Mental health is considered in terms of its functional impact on whether you're capable of holding a job. There's basically four areas under consideration: your ability to undo and remember tasks and instructions, things like that; your ability to maintain concentration; your ability to interact with other people; and your ability to adapt to changes and manage yourself.
There's a lot of jobs available in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles that you can theoretically perform even with some significant mental health impairments though. And keep in mind, this is pretty simplified, but that's the general principle.
I think there's a ton of benefit to getting a teacher, personally. They can guide your learning and provide advice on form and technique a lot easier than trying to figure it out with like, YouTube videos. If you're unsure whether it's for you and wanna get started before investing in a kit though, you can go a long way with a good practice pad, a pair of sticks, and a copy of Buddy Rich's Modern Interpretation of Snare Drum Rudiments
Not quite his style, he prefers getting pounded in the butt
I will do my best! My rule is I'm gonna approve if it's at all possible.
My drum room is her nap room. I have to let her know I'm gonna play whenever I do, so she'll leave and I can shut the door, minimize the noise to the rest of the house. She's naked or Donald Ducking it at all times, so every time I want to play I get an eyefull of her chocolate Cheerio before I can start
So in the US, the rules are quite frankly stupid. This is not an official post btw, just my own observations. I want to say before all this, I'm so sorry you're dealing with that.
We're required to make all our determinations according to what's called the POMS, available here: https://secure.ssa.gov/apps10/poms.nsf/chapterlist!openview&restricttocategory=04
In short, and unfortunately it's vastly more complicated than this, but it can take a long time before I even see your claim, and if you're under 50 it's really hard to be allowed on benefits. You basically need to be mentally unwell enough you can't sustain a normal work week in an unskilled job, or you literally can't stand up for 2 hours in a day and imaging and physical exams demonstrate that. We need to have a Medically Determined Impairment before we can assign any limitations to you, meaning if your MRI shows nothing and your doctors can't figure out what's wrong, essentially I can't allow you unless other specific criteria are met. All decisions that aren't allowances require a SSA doctor to sign off, so I can't make an entirely independent judgement that someone is not disabled. There's also Federal Quality Assurance, who will return claims if they disagree with the outcome, and they have a quota to meet.
It's all completely fucked to be honest. My best advice is be honest with your adjudicator about everything, especially your address, and appeal up to the level of an administrative law judge if denied, because they have a lot more leeway than we do in allowing people.
See, you don't read.
Me: I don't need to prove anything to you.
You: Prove me wrong.
Like, no. You can't even read and parse one paragraph, and you want me to compile a bunch of research you won't understand? You want me to explain the difference between a scant majority of the population who decided to and were permitted to vote and a vast majority of all people everywhere to someone who struggles with basic reading? What a laugh.