oftheair

joined 7 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 hours ago

What about being straight or at least having that label is it you dislike?

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Nice. Our point was the above image looks kind of made for the male gaze in a way as we think one made by/for women might have them covered with the blankets. It is just our interpretation though.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago

How did you know, mortal?

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That's why people have tags and similar stuff. That enters in con non con territory and some people are into it. Others are not and should be able to stay clear from it.

Yes exactly. Stay away from any{one/many} who does not respect your consent/boundaries. We would not suggest meeting some{one/many} and diving straight into things like hypnosis with them, take it slow, discuss boundaries etc and see how well they do with other kinks/fetishes before trusting them with something like this.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

I'm a different kind of princess from Galavant 2 minutes and 15 seconds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smCWu5TWn6Y

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Like all kink/fetishes it can be engaged in more or less responsibly. This is why RACK (Risk Aware Consensual Kink) exists. If you would like to know more please feel free to head over to our Kink Education and Discussion community !kink@lemmy.blahaj.zone as we wish to make people and other such creatures much safer when it comes to kink, even and especially one requiring such deep trust.

It is one of our main kinks and as such we are fairly well versed in it and its safety and how it can go wrong.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 days ago

Ah, something we do not enjoy. Thank you for explaining!

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Our goodnes no, that sounds terrible and unlikely to work on us. Thanks for explaining though!

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 days ago (5 children)

video overstimulation?

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 days ago

Interesting, thanks!

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/21465211

A wonderful video about positive asexual, aromantic and aroace representation both confirmed and somewhat confirmed also some headcanon.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/21465211

A wonderful video about positive asexual, aromantic and aroace representation both confirmed and somewhat confirmed also some headcanon.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/21465211

A wonderful video about positive asexual, aromantic and aroace representation both confirmed and somewhat confirmed also some headcanon.

 

A wonderful video about positive asexual, aromantic and aroace representation both confirmed and somewhat confirmed also some headcanon.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/21384758

A great video about how fandom really doesn't know how to handle asexual characters in media and likes to sexualise them regardless. There is nothing wrong with this in the sense of exploring identity etc in fan fiction inherently as long as they don't pretend that it's ever going to happen in canon or shout down asexuals who would like some characters that are canonically like them for once.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/21384758

A great video about how fandom really doesn't know how to handle asexual characters in media and likes to sexualise them regardless. There is nothing wrong with this in the sense of exploring identity etc in fan fiction inherently as long as they don't pretend that it's ever going to happen in canon or shout down asexuals who would like some characters that are canonically like them for once.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/21384758

A great video about how fandom really doesn't know how to handle asexual characters in media and likes to sexualise them regardless. There is nothing wrong with this in the sense of exploring identity etc in fan fiction inherently as long as they don't pretend that it's ever going to happen in canon or shout down asexuals who would like some characters that are canonically like them for once.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/21384758

A great video about how fandom really doesn't know how to handle asexual characters in media and likes to sexualise them regardless. There is nothing wrong with this in the sense of exploring identity etc in fan fiction inherently as long as they don't pretend that it's ever going to happen in canon or shout down asexuals who would like some characters that are canonically like them for once.

 

A great video about how fandom really doesn't know how to handle asexual characters in media and likes to sexualise them regardless. There is nothing wrong with this in the sense of exploring identity etc in fan fiction inherently as long as they don't pretend that it's ever going to happen in canon or shout down asexuals who would like some characters that are canonically like them for once.

12
We created TransSpecies (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/main@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

We created TransSpecies for all of you that don't see yoursel{f/ves} as human and would like to or are doing your best to transition to something that isn't that whether that's internally, socially, with technology or surgery (though it should be noted we don't gatekeep, exploring your identity is a-okay with us and there's no one way to be TransSpecies).

We will not be answering any questions or putting up with any remarks about us not existing or being mentally ill etc, such comments will just be reported and you will be banned from that community.

For all the rest of you, hope to see you there!

<3

!transspecies@lemmy.blahaj.zone

9
Introduce yoursel{f/ves} (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/transspecies@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

Hi all!

Introduce yoursel{f/ves} here.

I am a faerie most of the time, a member of the fae so my form sometimes changes.

Since we are plural the others may introduce themselves if they wish to.

 

So a partner and us are thinking about getting married so we can emigrate somewhere (we do genuinely want to be together). However we're both ace-spec and thus don't have sex.

We're also both not cis, nor monogamous.

They're also aromantic and thus with all these things we don't behave in a typical mono allocishet way.

So is there any hope for us or will marriage fraud investigators tell us no without us kissing, having sex and generally behaving as expected?

view more: next ›