nsrxn

joined 1 month ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

one of us is right.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

The stalk just gets tossed in for efficiency’s sake because the cows can also digest it.

you literally don't know anything about feeding cows. just stop.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

. If cows got more calories out of corn stalks than corn kernels, then they wouldn’t even finish growing the corn and would just feed them stalks.

I don't think so. they may get more calories from silage, but they prefer the kernels, which would help the feed go down easier.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

your shepon paper shows a great deal of spinach being fed to chickens. why would it be fed to chickens if it were suitable for human consumption? I don't actually know, but my guess is that it is not suitable for human consumption, and that is why it is fed to chickens. that's a conservation of resources. the potatoes fed to cattle are likely the same.

this paper doesn't discuss this discrepancy at all. I have to say I don't find the analysis very compelling.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

a soybean is only about 20% oil to begin with. that means that even using the numbers you have here, the oil is twice as valuable per pound compared to the rest of the bean.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

soybean cakes, which production can be considered as main driver or land-use, represent 4% of the global livestock feed intake.

you clipped this out of the abstract, but it's highly relevant to what I've been saying: this is a byproduct of pressing soybeans for oil. if we didn't feed it to livestock, it would be industrial waste.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

in didn't say it's free from harms. I'm saying we aren't using that land to grow crops.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

do you have the full papers? I can't really examine these claims from the links you provided.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

no one said they are exclusively grass fed, not that we should be doing that

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

Raising plants to feed animals so we can eat the animals is less efficient than raising plants for us to eat.

if that were the situation, you might be right. but since we actually feed livestock mostly crop seconds and byproducts, it's actually a conservation of resources in a lot of situations, with minimal competition with human food sources

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

beef cattle spend most of their life grazing.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

it's not mostly kernels. livestock are fed the entire plant, and the kernels are a slim minority of the weight.

 

they made cool workout posters, and still do, but I think they got dmca'd in 2016. the superheroes are all gone.

navigating archive. org is slow and often leads to "no hotlinking" and unavailable Google drive PDFs.

anyone got these stocked somewhere?

 

i unironically love this song and wish it weren't such a biting parody of me.

 

I just clocked 16.25 hours.

410
torrent (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
 

 

!politics@lemmy.dbzer0.com

!politicalmemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com

!vegan@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sick of moderation on some of the bigger instances and communities, I thought we could try hosting here, where I of course will only ever make the most correct moderation decisions.

everyone have a good laugh?

I’ll add mods but not yet. I’ll clarify rules as it becomes necessary.

I will remain the bdfl until db0 decides my incompetence is a detriment to his instance.

also looking to add some more current affairs type communities, but i think i'm rate-limited or something. if someone else wants to go ahead and make em, i'm interested!

view more: next ›