kokolores

joined 2 days ago
[–] kokolores@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago

There’s a lot going on in the US that I never thought would happen and it just goes on and on and on. Every day I read something that scares me even more.

To me it’s not that absurd that open source projects could be affected. Wouldn’t be the first time they tried (EARN IT Act or how often they tried to get backdoors in encrypted data https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/a-brief-history-of-the-nsa-attempting-to-insert-backdoors-into-encrypted-data )

To me it seems possible.

Yes, it’s open source, yes, it can be taken elsewhere and developed outside of the USA. It’s just that I’m extra cautious right now.

I agree with you, it’s not only the USA which is problematic, but currently the US is the country with the most power doing „shitty things“. That’s why you get extra bonus points.

[–] kokolores@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Just a couple of examples

Red Hat Developed by a U.S.-based company.

Fedora A community-driven project sponsored by Red Hat.

Debian Originally founded in the U.S., with some legal ties to US regulations.

Slackware developed by Patrick Volkerding in the US

Since these distributions are developed or registered in the United States, they are subject to US laws, regulations, and export restrictions.

When I have a look at what’s happening right now in the US I’m not sure what kind of laws will suddenly appear which might affect privacy and security of any kind of software from there. That’s why I decided to avoid them as much as possible.

I will certainly go through your suggestions and have a look if I should change stuff (apart from proton, I’m sure about changing this one).

[–] kokolores@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I listed the stuff I use and what I changed. There’s also a reason why I chose this specific Linux distro as I try to avoid as much as I can with the jurisdiction in the US, which means a lot of Linux distros are not an option anymore.

But that does not mean everyone needs to do the same. Do whatever you think is best.

[–] kokolores@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The main issue I have right now: the jurisdiction of this is in the US, and to be honest, I don’t trust the US that much when it comes to privacy laws regarding the (near) future.

[–] kokolores@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 hours ago

Fastmail: Privacy & Security Overview

+Encrypted storage & transit (TLS 1.3, Perfect Forward Secrecy).

+No ads, no data selling – user-funded.

+2FA & Passkey support for added security.

-Based in Australia – subject to laws like the Assistance and Access Act (2018).

-No built-in end-to-end encryption (E2EE) – requires third-party PGP/S/MIME.

https://www.fastmail.com/features/security

https://www.fastmail.com/policies/privacy

Good for privacy, but jurisdiction risks & lack of E2EE make alternatives like tuta (or proton) a better choice.

[–] kokolores@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I’m also not that happy with proton. Maybe tuta could be a replacement.

[–] kokolores@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 15 hours ago (10 children)

I’m also trying to avoid as much American tech as possible.

  • Vivaldi/qwant instead of Firefox/Google
  • Proton instead of gmail
  • Waiting for WERO impatiently until then virtual card from wise instead of PayPal
  • Void Linux instead of windows/macOS
  • Surfshark for VPN

Can’t change everything though. I have a company phone. I could get an extra private phone, but I’d still need to use the company phone for company related stuff. Same is true for the company laptop, but I do have my own computer.

It’s not perfect, but the important thing to me is trying as best as I can.

They believe, it’s a woman’s fault if she gets raped. Wrong clothes, wrong place to be, wrong friends, wrong man, wrong. Why do they believe this? Control. If it’s the woman’s fault, then it is preventable, she only needs to do the right thing. And now apply this to a greater scheme. It’s a woman’s responsibility how men are treating her, not by voting or being successful in her job or god forbid being a politician, no, just by modesty and pleasing her husband. And if a woman still gets hurt, well, she probably wasn’t modest enough. So getting extremer is the answer. That’s how they are thinking.

How exactly? Raising tariffs to 50%?