context

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] context@hexbear.net 75 points 5 months ago (3 children)

that's a what-about-ism, tankie

[–] context@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago

well if he were out there barefoot with an assault rifle in his pajamas he'd look ridiculous now wouldn't he?

[–] context@hexbear.net 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (9 children)

i never noticed his bare feet before. ready for combat with the protestors, but not at all prepared to step outside of a clean swept floor to do so. hope those windows behind you never break, buddy.

[–] context@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago

rat-salute-2 thanks! no worries

[–] context@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

please keep post titles informative and include a link to the source. you can quote scripture down in the comments.

[–] context@hexbear.net 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

thank you for clarifying again, because this means i didn't misinterpret. but maybe it's better to leave it up and try to explain more.

you seem to be a well meaning liberal. but you keep using the word "tribal" to be synonymous with "backwards and undeveloped." afghanistan and pakistan are not underdeveloped because they're tribal societies. rather, they're underdeveloped because of exploitation by imperialist countries throughout the past century or so. countries that notably justified their imperialist exploitation by claiming to bring modernity to the backwards tribal peoples they were exploiting. that's why your initial comment comes off as racist, you're basically insinuating that people exploited by imperialism are responsible for their own condition because their backwards ideas cause them to reject modernity.

"developing countries" are not underdeveloped, they are overexploited. the people are kept poor by exploitative trade relations that are enforced through imperialist violence. saying it's because they're "tribal" is just wrong, and is a notion rooted in subconscious white supremacy.

does that make sense? it's a ridiculous and racist comparison that you and neal stephenson are making. i don't think it's intentional on your part or his, but do please knock off the way you're using the word tribal.

[–] context@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

thank you for clarifying, i've restored your comment. i apologize for misinterpreting.

[–] context@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

fuck you, what shitty joke?

[–] context@hexbear.net 7 points 5 months ago (6 children)

seems like you're probably intending some kind of ironic "bringing modernity to the imperial core" thing, but it's coming across as ironic white man's burden, and ironic racism is just racism. please refrain.

[–] context@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

yea true, the problem is really that i'm a useless apparatchik

[–] context@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago

but of course!

view more: ‹ prev next ›