bonfire921

Well it really depends how you look at it. For the devs it's better in terms of how much they get per purchase given that epic takes a lower cut than steam, IIRC 15% as opposed to 30%.

But many users hate epic as a platform seeing how it's not as mature in features, and probably just pure love of steam.

What I'm actually wondering about is if it's worth signing the exclusivity deal seeing how some people will not bother buying a game on a platform they hate or do enough people purchase for it to even out and even gain a larger profit.

Its because the other exclusives are the devs/publishers launcher. While epic was actively seeking those 1year exclusivity deals to get more users on the platform.

Aluminum cans also have plastic in them

Neither will a socialy anxious person... Or a mute

Though honestly same could be said about the man in question, is he nice or hostile, can he control his urges or not, is he stable or a complete psycho. This question really goes both ways

I hate you for this pun

Ah of course, the well known Highly Transmittable Male Ligma

I'll say that while it still has features that Wayland doesn't it's not dead, it doesn't get updates yes but it still used by a lot of people for the fact that Wayland just doesn't support some stuff that x11 does. Great example I have is TeamViewer and Nvidia+KDE

Oh I'm not bitching, I'm enjoying an ad free YouTube without paying, while I do see value in the service, I don't have money just laying around to throw ever so willingly at it, while I could spend it on a meal or two.

If I can get what I need for free then I'll do it, if I can't then I'll move to something else.

Now imagine that.

Well great, I neither pay nor do I watch the ads, I'll save my 12$ a month elsewhere

Idk about amd but I do know Nvidia has Optimus on Linux that works as it should, maybe your talking about a laptop with a mux switch? Which you have to reboot no matter what when seitching

xif, to be inclusive