SpaceCadet

joined 2 years ago
[–] SpaceCadet 15 points 1 year ago

Getting downvoted is one thing. There is definitely a certain bias in the wider fediverse community on this topic, so it's normal that your comments aren't received well. It isn't manipulative and probably an accurate reflection of what the community thinks.

What lemmy.ml is doing is more insidious though. They are manipulating the discussion by actively muzzling users with dissenting opinions.

[–] SpaceCadet 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe your instance has defederated from it?

Also I think the activity level is measured as activity from your instance, not globally.

[–] SpaceCadet 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceCadet 48 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm not sure how they accomplish that

If they have database access, which they would have being the admins, they can do anything.

[–] SpaceCadet 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think unlike on hexbear and lemmygrad, most lemmy.ml users simply don't know, and many communities hosted there are bona fide. I'm not throwing stones at them, it's the admins of the instance that I have a beef with.

[–] SpaceCadet 1 points 1 year ago
  • Red Hat Linux 5.1 - 7.x
  • Slackware 7.0 - 12.0
  • Ubuntu 6.10 - 9.10
  • Slackware 13.37 - 14.1
  • Mint 16 - 17
  • Arch
[–] SpaceCadet 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What you're describing is not a man-in-the-middle proxy, but a simple DNS block. That's a very crude approach to blocking ads and notoriously doesn't work for YouTube and Google ads because they're served from the same domain.

I run a pihole myself but there's still a huge difference between browsing with pihole only and pihole+ublock. It's certainly not the answer to the Manifest V3 shenanigans.

[–] SpaceCadet 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That man-in-the-middle principle doesn't work with TLS.

[–] SpaceCadet 5 points 1 year ago

Same here. Made the switch back to Firefox a year ago when I saw the writing on the wall about where Google wanted to take Chrome with Manifest V3.

[–] SpaceCadet 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thanks.

FEX is an x86 emulator

So my real question is really about this: common wisdom is that emulating a whole CPU architecture is a performance killer. Does that apply here, and are they just running games that can take the hit? Or phrased differently: given that it's emulated, could this ever have near-native (CPU) performance, or nah?

[–] SpaceCadet 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah god forbid people have some interesting discussion on this platform, right?

view more: ‹ prev next ›