Slotos

In societies that are used to obedience that is truly a defiance. As it should be.

You’re jumping ahead of the train. Draft can be edited multiple times before it becomes law. If it becomes law.

So no, this is not anywhere close to being resolved.

After

Addendum: please stop promoting Medusa as a source. They are disgusting fuckers.

Googling at least until fairly recently meant „I consulted an index of Internet”. It is a means to get to the bit of information.

Asking ChatGPT is like asking a well-behaved parrot in the library and believing every word it says instead of reading the actual book the librarian would point you towards.

As is guilt.

So that manufacturers can patch up remote exploits, duh!

I don’t get it, I regularly hold my breath for a second or two with no adverse consequences.

It took me way too long to realize that Russia and Israel haven’t actually made a new defense deal (yet).

Now you have to trust the software used to do this, the algorithm itself, and that there was no tampering before the data got stored. Which is something truly verifiable by a very tiny subset of population and even then with full cooperation from authorities. This is the opaqueness of countermeasures.

Vote counting is not a mathematical problem, but a sociological one. Any „always correct machine” is useless if people can’t reasonably trust it.

Paper ballots don’t scale - you can’t stuff ballots without someone being present - and are designed exactly in the problem space vote counting itself occupies. As an additional evidence in their favor, autocratic regimes and corrupt politicians are way too eager to switch to electronic voting.

It’s not checks that are the issue, but the scalability of the offensive and the inevitable opaqueness of countermeasures.

So what I hear is that if I manage to get through AI driven screening process, I’ll be the top candidate. If.