Mickey7

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 
 
 
[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder how much free time he has for stuff like this.

 
 
 
[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I didn't know there was a difference. Thanks for the explanation

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There is only one mod listed and their last post or comment activity anywhere on lemmy was 11 months ago

 
 

There is currently very little activity in the group. This type of group gets a lot of traffic on other social media platforms. There is only one mod listed. The last post that they made anywhere on Lemmy was 11 months ago. I can help revive this group.

 
[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I wonder if the water has that sweet smell of female nectar

 
[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

February 20, 2025 FacebookTwitterLinkedIn Tags: Consumer Protection Competition Office of Policy Planning Technology Social Media Today, the Federal Trade Commission launched a public inquiry to better understand how technology platforms deny or degrade users’ access to services based on the content of their speech or affiliations, and how this conduct may have violated the law.

Censorship by technology platforms is not just un-American, it is potentially illegal. Tech firms can employ confusing or unpredictable internal procedures that cut users off, sometimes with no ability appeal the decision. Such actions taken by tech platforms may harm consumers, affect competition, may have resulted from a lack of competition, or may have been the product of anti-competitive conduct.

The FTC issued a Request for Information (RFI) requesting public comment on how consumers may have been harmed by technology platforms that limited their ability to share ideas or affiliations freely and openly.

“Tech firms should not be bullying their users,” said FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson. “This inquiry will help the FTC better understand how these firms may have violated the law by silencing and intimidating Americans for speaking their minds.”

Tech platform users who have been banned, shadow banned, demonetized, or otherwise censored are encouraged to share their comments in response to the RFI. The FTC is interested in understanding how consumers—including by potentially unfair or deceptive acts or practices, or potentially unfair methods of competition—have been harmed by the policies of tech firms.

The public will have until May 21, 2025 to submit a comment. Once submitted, comments will be posted to Regulations.gov. If consumers would prefer to file a private report with the FTC instead, they can go to ReportFraud.ftc.gov and click “Report Now.”

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. The FTC will never demand money, make threats, tell you to transfer money, or promise you a prize. You can learn more about consumer topics and report scams, fraud, and bad business practices online at ReportFraud.ftc.gov. Follow the FTC on social media, read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

 
 
[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

He ate the last person that asked to get by

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

Remember a time when something was just funny and not viewed through a political spectrum.

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I still don't understand if you are allowed to have multiple accounts. I mean being totally upfront using the same email account for verification.

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

"choke the chicken"??

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

If you are not in a poor cell reception area, I can't imagine why anyone would still have a land line.

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I thought it said "Smegma" which is a natural, oily substance that accumulates under the foreskin in uncircumcised males and in the folds of the labia in females.

view more: next ›