MasterDeeLuke

joined 4 years ago
[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 1 day ago

Orange man upset that Russia didn't fall for the snake oil this time and agree to yet another one sided truce.

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Because socialist movements how a far greater chance of succeeding in a world where major powers are divided rather then the US/NATO having absolute dominance and control. If the US has no major rivals they are free to use their resources on playing world police and smother socialist country or movement before it has the chance to get off the ground. Obviously, worldwide socialism is the ultimate goal, but multipolarity is the most feasible next step towards that.

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago

They would be better off with Big Beautiful Bullfrogs if they want to make great leaps into space.

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

Not surprising to me in the least, Spotify has been consistently showing their colors and all you need to do is look how big they were in being pro-ukraine in 2022. A complete no go for me.

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, it's Lindsay Graham again, the guy pioneering the shitty depths of neoconservatism.

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
  1. The DPRK is built around self-sufficiency as a founding principle, and as such can do whatever they want. Iran is more self-sufficient then most, but still can't tank sanctions the same way.

  2. The DPRK has a defensive alliance with China which of course makes the west more hesitant to bomb them while Iran for the most part is alone.

  3. As a poster here from Iran has said, there might be a dangerously high number of liberals in Iran's government who want to be accepted by the west rather then stand up against them.

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Simply put I just don't think Soviet era S-300s which make up the majority of Iran's AD are sufficient against stealth aircraft like the F-35. They would need quantum radar systems like China has to reliably counter them and Iran just isn't at that level.

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes but I think most libs would superficially agree that the Vietnam war was a mistake. Praising the Vietnam war as something good is more of a hard right chud thing.

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Appropriate- Condemning past wars

Inappropriate- Condemning present wars

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago

I find DW to be insufferable even by Western media standards. It's thinly veiled NATO state media.

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (6 children)

Demanding the PLA to go marching to Iran's aid of course would be silly but it's clear Iran is suffering a severe deficit in their air defense and are very much in a vulnerable position if no one steps to help them in that area at least. It's not going to stretch the US empire all that much if they decide to simply start wrecking havoc on Iran with B2 bombers. I don't think anyone who doesn't already hate China is going to be upset if they start sending Iran Pakistan level military aid.

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, because George Washington and his crew didn't want to give the wrong message about monarchies back in 1776 and succeeded through their commitment to non-violence.

 

This time in Gabon. I don't know much at all about Gabon's politics but from doing some quick reading it appears to be yet another ousting of a French puppet just like in Niger.

view more: next ›