EmoDuck

joined 2 years ago
[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago

Or so the Germans would have you believe

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Oh no, we were too loud and woke up Belgium too. Quick Congo, run and hide!

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Some real cow tools vibes going on

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Every single time I've thrown out a big box, I've ended up regretting it

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wait, I've never heard of that, lemme try it.
Did it work?

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

I don't use loanwords, all words I use are of my own, original creation. If another language also happens to use that word, then that's just a coincidence

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Just get an unbirthing fetish and then do that in reverse

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That story again?

The chain of evidence for that shawl is extremely questionable, as ut only entered evidence like a decade ago and was previously in private ownership

The article doesn't go into detail about the type of DNA analysis but previous if it was based on mitochondrial DNA it could be very inaccurate

That's like saying "A diary entry from 1888, found in private ownership in 2010, said that Jack the Ripper wore glasses. Kosminski wore glasses, therefore we can say with 100% certainty that he was the murderer!"

Also, don't believe articles that use phrases like "100% certain". If forensics were this good, we'd have no need for courts

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

What the fuck?

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago
Wordle 1,335 5/6

⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜
🟨🟩🟨⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
4
Space girl~ 🪐🍡🍞 (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works to c/hololive@lemmy.world
view more: next ›