He's the Jeffrey Combs of superhero movies.
Archangel1313
joined 1 week ago
And Harvard tuition fees go, "Brrrrrrrrrr!"
Not just the 1st...but, also the 14th.
Considering this word really applies most to people like Joe Rogan, I find this whole thing pretty ironic.
If he's just going to let them all die from preventable causes, then he shouldn't be allowed to have any more children. That's just straight up negligence.
Why would they need to "smuggle" him back into the country? He's an innocent man, wrongfully incarcerated in a foreign prison. What the fuck is wrong with these assholes?
That process still needs to happen. You can't just assume what the final outcome is going to be, and just proceed as if it can't be challenged. That defeats the entire purpose of judicial review.
If there is even the slightest possibility that the order given, is in conflict with the Constitution...then allowing it to proceed at all, is also a violation of the Constitution. Putting that order on pause, until the review process can be completed...all the way up to the Supreme Court if necessary...is the only logical option.
Or do you think it's fine to keep breaking the law for potentially months, until the Supreme Court can confirm what even the lowest courts were able to determine was illegal?
Why would they give him back? The US is paying them to keep these people. That was the deal. Giving him back means they don't get paid.
Is it officially considered a "Constitutional crisis" yet? This kind of logic only works on toddlers, when you want to make an excuse about something and you know they lack the mental maturity to dispute it. Normal, rational adults all understand what this means.
So, when are the adults in the room going to step up and say something about it? Or are we all just going to pretend we're toddlers, and don't understand what this means?
Seriously. That option needs to be removed from the Charter. I haven't heard one instance where it was used in a positive way. It's always to do something that violates someone else's rights.
Who's going to stop him? At this point, it seems pretty obvious he can just do whatever he wants. The Constitution is dead, right along with the Judiciary's authority to challenge him.