Sadly I do so every week when going to the cinema
96VXb9ktTjFnRi
Worldview: governments bad, companies good. Why?
Because goverments don't have skin in the game. Business people play with their own money, so don't want to waste anything. Besides, if they do a bad job they'll go bankrupt, whereas government agencies just get new funding no matter how bad a job they do.
I mean, there's some logic to this line of reasoning, no doubt. But you could plead the reverse and there's logic to that as well.
People working for government actually care about what they do, they have the public interest at heart, not just their own bankaccount. Government employees know that they're using taxpayer money, and that they'll be held accountable if they waste it. Business employees don't give a shit about about their companies, particulary the very big multinational conglomerates, that we have so many of these days. Any money made only goes to the boss anyway, and he's an asshole, or the shareholders, and so are they. Aslong as we get away with it, who gives a fuck what gets done with all the money.
But this worldview 'governments bad, companies good', is certainly dominant among DOGE folks and rarely questioned. The west had to have this worldview, or else the ideas of "communism can only ever fail no matter what exact shape or form it takes" and "capitalism is the only thing that works" crumble. Let's be real here, the inefficiencies of capitalism are never ever questioned. Surely ads and marketing are for the benefit of all right. Spending tons to get everyone to smoke and drink sugarwater and alcohol, not by free choice but by clever manipulation. That shit is not inefficient in any way is it? Big pharma spending more money on marketing than on research is not inefficient in any way is it? No, quite the reverse, scientist getting government funds to do fundamental research, with no business agenda in mind, surely that would be inefficient. Companies just need to be companies and everything will be fine. Don't think about it, just go with it. It's our religion.
Is it me or do remotes have to many buttons these days?
yes, but leading here doesn't mean much, given how small the biggest party is in actual numbers. All it takes is for the reasonable parts of society to exclude these folks from coalitions. They're not big enough that they can't be ignored. It's worked for many years, lets return to that.
These kids have a hatred for those who bomb and starve em, bunch of antisemites, if they grow up chances are they'll take revenge, that's why they need to be starved now. Makes a lot of sense /s
Fair point
"You can’t remember their favourite song, so you try to login to their Spotify account. Then you realise the account login is inaccessible, and with it has gone their personal history of Spotify playlists, annual “wrapped” analytics, and liked songs curated to reflect their taste, memories, and identity"
Instead you could track your listening habits on ListenBrainz. In doing so you safeguard yourself from Spotify ever restricting access to your data, data which they consider theirs. For ListenBrainz of course you must be willing to share your data freely, but it will be for the benefit of all, whilst if you don't it will only be used for the benefit of Spotify corporates. You'll help facilitate a healthy online music ecosystem, because people can built apps on top of the ListenBrainz dataset. You can get recommendations from algorithms of your choice instead of having to rely on Spotifys algorithms.
Not working for Listenbrainz in any way, just an enthousiastic user that plugs it when he sees fit :)
Believes in free software...
But uses Twitter...
Kropotkin's the Conquest of Bread is a good read, and surprisingly readable, if you do want to try some theory.
Where as we Europeans tend to visit every state in the US. /s
I think you're right in what you're saying except for my intentions. To be honest, I never make news posts on here, this is my first one. I came across this fact in Dutch news and hadn't seen it on here, so I decided to share it. I am first to admit that maybe I should've paid more attention to the correct wording of the title. What would you deem proper. Something like "Microsoft blocks email-access for ICC prosecutor in accordance with US sanctions over Netanyahu arrest warrant"?
I don't have a car
I don't care to respond
I don't mind sounding poor.
Wealth beyond what is good for you is no better than theft I'd say. Buying expensive watches while little children grow up in poverty is nothing to be proud of. If anyone should feel shame it should be that guy. Don't be humiliated by such shameless assholes. And don't try to counter attack, It won't work, they don't share your values, they feel no shame for the things that they do. Instead let's organize and fight them where it hurts. Taxes, taxes, taxes.