this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
220 points (100.0% liked)

196

17966 readers
181 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

from the early 18th century

h/t to @jetton@mastodon.online

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 years ago (2 children)

At least this idiot had the excuse of historical linguistics being so underdeveloped; it's understandable he'd think language was immutable... but he's still a total idiot who apparently thought God spoke English in the Bible instead of Latin and Hebrew.

[–] prayer@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

God spoke Aramaic to Paul and wrote in Hebrew to Moses. I don't think he thought of God speaking English in the Bible, rather than English was invented by God and man "ought not corrupt God's language."

[–] ssfckdt@mastodon.cloud 8 points 2 years ago

These are people who insist that the KJV, perhaps history's absolute worst translation of scripture ever, as the single solitary legitimate version of the Bible.

[–] mashbooq@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

Conservatives are so dramatic, Jesus

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wonder if there were 18th century shitposters who turned this into copypasta but subbed in "s" and "ſ" in place of "you" and "thou"

[–] snorkbubs@fedia.io 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ye olde shitte transcribers

[–] ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I wish whatever jackaſs that decided that the long ſ needed a ſtupid nub at exactly the ſame poſition as the croſsbar of the letter f in Roman typefaces a very unpleaſant afterlife. As if OCRing hiſtorical documents didn't have enough problems already.

[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Alt text:

Again, the corrupt and unsound Form of speaking in the Plural Number to a single person, YOU to One, instead of THOU, contrary to the pure, plain, and single Language of TRUTH, THOU to One, and YOU to more than One, which had always been used by GOD to Men, and Men to GOD, as well as one to another, from the oldest Record of Time, till corrupt Men, for corrupt Ends, in later and corrupt Times, to flatter fawn, and work upon the corrupt Nature of Men, brought in that false and senseless Way of speaking YOU to One; which hath since corrupted the modern Languages, and hath greatly debased the Spirits, and depraved the Manners of Men. This evil Custom

[–] z500@startrek.website 8 points 2 years ago

HE'LL YEAH BORTHER!!!

needs the ſ in alt text to be correct

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

I imagine romans had a lot of bitching about pronouns back in the day. Mostly because bitching about pronouns is an important part of learning Latin over a thousand years later. Like seriously use whatever pronouns you want, but there’s such a thing as too many and that fucking language has too many

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago

Wow, he foundf ferioif

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

fenflefs. Why use the weird s (f) when they have the normal s

[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's called the long s (ſ; ſenſeleſs). It's actually pretty interesting, but unfortunately I don't have much time to explain right now, so in short, it exists because language.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago

English has never not been jank af

[–] match@pawb.social 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

they also say fpeaking and spirits, so maybe they were pronounced different

[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, they were pronounced exactly the same, but everyone who could write was a nerd

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

But it's still fun to read it as if he had a fat lip.

[–] z500@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The f-like letter is the form they used inside of a word, and it's actually called long s: ſ. Short s was used at the end of a word and after a long s.

[–] N0body@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

Thou art a grammar Prussian, good sir.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago

Pure, plain, and single language of T R U T H

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What is the source for this? I feel strong tshirt potential

[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] puchaczyk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago

I guess isekais weren't the first to make those stupid long titles...

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Wow that's wild. I thought for sure that it was fake.

[–] Trev625@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] tb_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Trev625@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Neat, I did not know that. I was just trying to make a funny since it looked like it said "oof-ed by GOD". Thanks for sharing!

[–] Z3R0C00l@artemis.camp 5 points 2 years ago

I have a shorter version. LMAO

[–] nyhetsjunkie@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

That a halluva moufull.

[–] emerald@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

Something about the typeface made me read this with a lisp