this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
6 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

350 readers
128 users here now

Share interesting Technology news and links.

Rules:

  1. No paywalled sites at all.
  2. News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
  3. No videos.
  4. Post only direct links.

To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:

More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.

Encouraged:

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

How can a monitor with no display be recommended over one that had a broken display?

I can provide at least 2 reasons. First, one with no display was designed with that in mind. The screen may be a vital part of the product and without it is functionally useless, e.g. a laptop. Secondly, even if it's not that vital, you're paying for functionality you aren't getting.

That said, if this is an issue covered under warranty I'm not even sure why it was that big of a factor even if it's critical to the product. Definitely worth mentioning in the review but these types of reviews almost never test the longevity of the product so it's difficult for them to say their experience is typical or that the screen won't last long.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's a pretty shit way to do a review.

"I cannot recommend the iPhone, because the USB cable that came with our unit was defective and we could not power it on. Rating: F"

Reviewing a broken unit doesn't tell the reader anything about the product. It's lazy and harms both the manufacturer and the reader who's expecting fair reviews.

Lazy work by that writer and the editor who approved it.

[–] aev_software@programming.dev 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It does expose quality assurance problems. Products shouldn't be defective out of the box. It happens: you send it back and get it replaced. But the reputation is damaged already.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Sure, it's a thing to note. I see these things mentioned in reviews regularly, but it's just "we had a problem with x, but it was covered by the warranty and they sent a replacement."

Reviewing the product as if the broken screen is part of the product is lazy and unprofessional. Not to mention, kind of besides the point for most users who are likely plugging it into a smarthome system so the information is readily accessible from their phone or smartwatch.


Ironically, because of this post I looked at some other reviews (who's screen had zero issues) and they were all positive. Especially about the integrations with other open source projects in the home automation space.

I've looked at adding air quality monitoring to my system, there's a lot of modules available, but unless you want to build them into a Raspberry pi and write your own integrations your choices are pretty limited (and often tied to proprietary, cloud-based, products).

$200 to have all those sensors professionally assembled, with a case and software support for the FOSS ecosystem is pretty good. Even if it didn't have a screen at all.