Linux

2 gigs of ram is going to be incredibly rough in 2025. Linux is better on old hardware but those specs are pretty optimistic.

2gb of ram really isn't enough

At least give them something usable. I see a lot of 6th gen machines on the market and they can be loaded with 8/16gb of ram.

When quarantines hit and everyone was communicating via zoom, I offered to recycle people's computers and destroy their old hard drives for free. I'd remove and drill multiple holes through the hard drives, vacuum/dust the computer, install a small, inexpensive HDD, and install Ubuntu.

Then I'd install zoom and chrome (sorry) and then pair each computer with a wired mouse, keyboard, and webcam that I had laying around in bulk. Then I'd drop these computers off at shelters, elder communities, and religious institutions. Essentially, anywhere you'd find someone who didn't have the means to contact family, attend an interview, or whatever.

Recycling/upcycling old computers isn't just good for the environment and your investment, it's good for your community!

That's probably okay if all you want to do is browse the web.

But with an Intel celeron you're not going to get very far even if you do have a more efficient operating system.

Love the “Installed and tested by Tim G.”

Hey bro you got Tim G. PC too?

Thanks Tim!

I'm all about upcycling PCs with Linux, but I think selling a PC with 2GB RAM is going to make Linux look bad. It's gonna handle its resources better than windows, but 2GB is just too little for today's standards. It will not run well.

edit:considering this is 10 years old judging by the versions used, back then it would have been okayish, I have a convertible from that time with the same specs but it just can't keep up anymore.

I had an exact machine like this, with these specs, just with an internal Nvidia GPU and 4 extra video cards added. Using USB splitters and USB audio cards, we made that computer work for 5 users simultaneously.

Built software for initial setup (what USB mouse and KB goes with what monitor?) and it worked like a charm.

There was even enough ram available to run a single virtual box instance with Windows XP (I believe) for one single user.

The Linux desktop was skinned to look like Windows XP too and for class rooms we used... I forgot the name, some open source classroom management system where the teacher could guide students remotely

Linux is awesome

"Ewww, Ubuntu? Honey, don't touch it. We're an Arch family."

-No one ever

My husband says eMachines have a pretty common capacitor problem. It's an easy fix to remove and replace for people who know how.

Before selling, the capacitors should be visually checked, at minimum, because they can leak and that's no good.

This may as well be porn to me.

Idk what year that pic was taken, but 2GB of ram is useless no matter what operating system you put on it.

Except ofc for a home nas, but as a desktop, the user is going to open Firefox, try to open a website, it will take minutes to load and the user just wasted $20

Ubuntu 16.04? Was this photo taken 8-9 years ago?

I know it’s an old photo but it’s funny to me how they describe the machine itself in very simple terms in a way that any person could probably understand with minimal technical knowledge (here’s the programs it has it works ok), and then there’s so much internet lingo and borderline tech speak for the reasons to opt for Linux instead of Windows lol. Could have started with “it’s faster!”

runs great on older less powerful hardware

better hardware support, not having to hunt down drivers

I remember installing Linux on my old laptop. It took me half a day to find working drivers for my WiFi card. It's probably better now but whenever I read stuff like this I call bullshit.