this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
171 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

73331 readers
3653 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

On one hand, requiring calls to be done on the native app but not on the web one because "muh encryption" was always stupid.

On the other hand, the Native app was really well done.
A well made app using the native OS ui toolkit is so rare. Now it's turning into yet another stupid web wrapper.
I'm so sick of everything being a web page.

[–] shashi154263@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I have a lot of problems with the native version. So much so that I use web app even though I have native app installed.

[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Why would anyone care about it being uglier?

It's WhatsApp. Ugly is their visual identity.

If they changed their app to resemble a neon citylight barely anyone would even notice, let alone complain.

[–] Crabhands@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago

The less Meta owned software installed, the better.

[–] SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Does this mean they'll finally be adding calls to the web version?

Good thing I don’t use it

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip -2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It amazes me people use this crap. I guess people just don't give a fuck about their life.

Yes I know it is extraordinarily popular in many places of the world. Mine included. The hardest part isnt friends, it is businesses.

Friends/family have been easy enough: we are going to use signal for example. They go ok, whatever. But business got complacent. We always work it out in the end anyways. Or I wont give them my business.

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm really happy that this is not relevant to me.

... because I don't use Windows. I wish it was also because I managed to get rid of WhatsApp from my life.

[–] ChromaticMan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wish it was also because I managed to get rid of WhatsApp from my life.

Jup, impossible for me if I want to keep in contact with 90% of my friends.

[–] chuso@fedia.io 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yep! Time to go back to the old ways... Brb while i just load up my server with 10tb of DVD rips from my garage and hook them up to my raspberry pi with jellyfin

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 week ago

Waiter! waiter! more webslop please!

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m just thinking now that the Mac is next.

I thought that as much as these companies preach about LLMs doing their coding, the cost of development would go down, no? So why does it need to reduce everything to a single code base to make it easier for developers?

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Facebook also developed react native so I don’t know what their excuse is.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

React native isn't the same as native

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago

The whole point of webapps was not to have os specific ones. somehow smartphones caused everything to move backwards.

[–] Shape4985@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I dont mind the web app as i dont have to install anything and i can sandbox it to my browser.

Edit: using ublock in whatsapp ;)

I never installed their app on Windows. I figured it could just randomly watch what I was doing, log keystrokes, view websites and history etc. I don't know if I'm misunderstanding how much Windows apps can spy on each other - they don't seem to ask for permissions etc.

[–] OmegaSunkey@ani.social 4 points 1 week ago

What's so funny is that they were going to allow encrypted (they say) calls on the web app but then suddenly released a native windows client and told everyone if you wanted calls you need to use it, then removed all buttons for calls or video calls.

I guess they're coming back on that.

[–] RoadTrain@lemdro.id 3 points 1 week ago

It's a shame. The app worked well, and it was nice to have a native look rather than a generic web one.

[–] Mhad1@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does anyone have any idea why, I thought it was also quite liked by the community, no need to open up the extreamly slow web browser just to post one image or pdf

[–] imecth@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

It's in the article. Each different version you maintain is an additional strain and added cost. It's why applications are increasingly moving towards web versions.

I've literally only ever used the web version on windows. It works fine, so what's the problem? what functionality is being lost?

More ram usage? oh no! I couldn't possibly have free Ram left!