this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
882 points (84.0% liked)

Political Memes

8949 readers
2690 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (44 children)

What is the point of this meme? I feel like the only thing this can produce is people to not try to reform and improve the democratic party and take it over (like the tea party took over the republicans). Kind of like these "give up climate change it can't be stopped" posts that just benefits the big fossil fuels companies

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (8 children)

That's the point, I've noticed a lot of the loudest, most active posters on Lemmy ultimately want one thing, which is progressives not to vote. Weird how that's what the conservatives have relied on for every presidential victory they've achieved in the past half century or more.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (43 replies)
[–] Nico_198X@europe.pub 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

you have no choice except this or violent revolt because your election system is garbage.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (6 children)

They had their chance in 2016 to include Bernie Sanders, Democrats blew their chance by ditching Bernie.

[–] theonetruedroid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Bernie is too liberal for all those big donors who pump up the Democrats via Super PACs. He might get in the way of them profiting off the American people. Bernie would have been the best choice for this country at beating back the MAGA movement before it became what we have now.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

While the new progressive "MAGA" forms, we have to get MAGA/GOP out. Look to the good Dem primaries and pick the more progressive Bernie Sanders types.

MAGA needs to go though, if most of the country turns on the GOP, could probably have enough seats to impeach and remove Trump. Then do the same to Vance, then a dem speaker of the house could take over.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

They've drifted so far right that I call them Republicrats, and y'all should too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BillDaCatt@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (21 children)

While I mostly agree with this, I have one significant hurdle I am unable to overcome. What other choice do I have?

I can't stand most Democrats. They suck! But they are a far cry better than voting Republican. And voting for a third party feels like wasting my vote.

If there was a third party candidate that focused on climate change and social issues and had even the slightest chance of winning, I would vote for them in a second. Until then, I am stuck voting for the lesser of two evils.

load more comments (21 replies)

I'll go further: It wouldn't be enough to simply reform one political party, anyway. The U.S. Constitution is a dead document, and its system of government is obsolete. The black hats have discovered the exploits, and everybody now knows how to game the system. We can't repair the system from inside the system, since it at the bottom line it runs on trust, and that trust in the system is gone. Just like in any relationship, it takes some material change to get people to trust again.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You also cannot replace it with a third party. So I guess we’re just fucked?

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's almost like the original assertion is bullshit!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

"We'd rather have a convicted felon pedophile be president because the Democrats don't want to dismantle capitalism entirely and replace with... well we don't know what with".

  • Absolute fucking dumbasses.
[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Strawman? Like 3 separate strawman arguments?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 30 points 2 days ago (15 children)

If Zohran Mamdani gets elected and actually follows through with his campaign promises, this is factually incorrect. I am holding on to that last glimmer of hope.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

actually follows through with his campaign promises

Don't count on it. Not for any bad reason, just that things are harder to implement than campaign promises, whether it's city council in the way or just practicality.

I'm just saying he can be a success without implementing all of his campaign ideas.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (12 children)

It may not be worth the effort to reform it, but claiming that it "can't" be reformed is asinine. A political party is not some higher order being, timeless and unchanging, nor even one with a fundamental permanent set of core tenants that all else springs from. It's a group of people with a bit of bureaucracy that influence and decide somewhat collectively on their shared goals. Of course that can change fundamentally.

In fact it has changed fundamentally in the not too distant past. Look at the Democratic party (and the Republican party) of the Jim Crow era compared to today. They essentially flipped to the other side of the political spectrum. It's absolutely not easy to change a party fundamentally and not quick to do so, either. Old minds are not easily swayed with the times. The primary way to change party ideals is through new minds and perspectives joining the party and the old ones leaving it. Generational change is slow AF but it does definitely happen. Concerted effort for young people with new ideals to join the party is the best way to induce this change. Again though, that is a lot of effort and takes times. The bigger he ship, the harder to steer. There are alternatives, all of which also take a ton of effort, probably a lot more effort really, but might be faster if it works out.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›