this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
293 points (98.0% liked)

Political Memes

8779 readers
3020 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

What's next, the Bald Eagles Party? The July 4th Firecracker Party? The Loaded Glock Party?

How much on the damn nose do you want it? I can't.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Maybe New Order?

[–] KingOogaBooga@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I am trying to get the new names straight. I have seen that overseas media was referring to the Republicans as the American Fascist Party which works. But what is Musky's new party going to be, the American Nazi Party? Just want to update my apocalypse bingo cards.

[–] Crispycrebs@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Maybe a weirdly bent windmill for a logo eh?

[–] plyth@feddit.org 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

How could Trump successfully use the America first slogan with that history?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_First_Party_(1943)

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

dog whistles.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Rhetorical question, right?

[–] plyth@feddit.org 4 points 3 hours ago

No. It is a level of dog whistling that everybody but Fox News should point out.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 46 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Go ahead, split the Nazi vote

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I thought the US Nazi political party was called the Republican Party?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

We've had one Nazi party, yes, but what about second Nazi party?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago

This is getting out of hand - now there are two of them!

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

you're not wrong

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

There is a small difference though. Musk has shown in the past that it is possible to shame him into changing his mind. He is at least somewhat receptive to what the public thinks of him. Trump, on the other hand, has absolutely no shame and doesn't care if 90% of the country is against him as long as the 10% who are with him are enough to fill a rally room.

Musk is not constitutionally eligible for the presidency so if we were to come to power then he'd probably assume some newly-made office created just for him. They'd probably make a new prime minister-like role where he has the power to "advise" (i.e. dictate) policy decisions to the president.

That being said, power changes people. Hard to say whether a hypothetical Imperial Chancellor Musk would act much differently from King Trump I. I wager not substantially. Trump, at least, creates a lot of funny memes with his ridiculous fuck-ups. I fear Musk would be far more competent.

This is almost the opposite of what's true. I wouldn't call Trump in touch, but he was far more aware of how stupid cutting social security was politically than his contemporaries. It's only now that he isn't as reliant on popular sentiment that he's willing to cut popular programs.

Musk has always been far less savvy about politics, and never seemed to understand such restraint. Him becoming shadow president is pure fantasy. At best, he'll become a feudal lord in an independent Texas Republic or some shit; I'm more expecting him to fade into obscurity.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago)

Musk wasn't shamed and didn't change his mind. He wants to chainsaw government, and he still wants to. Trump isn't chainsawing in the manner he wants to - I think he wants libertarianism.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

you can't reform a nazi.

he's doing this because he wants a seat at the nazi state. but he's hated by everyone he works with so they kicked him out.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

It's not about "reforming" him. I'm talking about the fact that if he will at least consider whether a proposal is popular before he does it. If it's within the margin of error or at least close enough to cover it up and pretend, it won't stop him, but if it's overwhelmingly unpopular it will cause him to think twice, but it is not guaranteed to change his mind. Again, this is based on past behaviour which is not necessarily indicative of the future.