this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
105 points (99.1% liked)

politics

24592 readers
3043 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I've got good news and bad. The good news is you're the first black woman to serve on The Supreme Court. The bad news is that same court is pretty much a rubber-stamping kangaroo court, stacked against you with a bunch of lying, partisan hacks who don't care about The Constitution, so...uh...have to it.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 6 points 23 hours ago

At least she's helping document history in her dissents? I'm sure people will take them seriously in 90 years when this happens again.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This woman is amazing. I hope she gets the big seat someday.

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I hope she gets the big seat someday.

That's not how it works in the US.

Edit: In many other countries the most senior justice becomes the chief justice by seniority, and I was saying that's not how it works in the US. But it looks like there have been four times when an associate justice has been "promoted" to chief justice, which I didn't realize. The first being John Rutledge in 1795 and Rehnquist being the most recent in 1986.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I never specified how she got there, so I'm not sure what you think you're on about. Feel free to enlighten me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is if the seat is vacated then the president at the time could nominate her for that position, and pick someone else to fill her current role if she gets confirmed for the position. I know it's unlikely to actually work out that way, but IMHO she would make an excellent choice for the first black female in that role. It would go a LONG way towards correcting the damage done by Republicans over recent decades to the validity of America's professed "world leader" status.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Or we just hang the 6 treasonous fuckers (in Dune Awakening) and let Sotomayor and Kagen retire. Boom Chief Justice KBJ as nature intended.

This woman is a national treasure.