this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
264 points (99.3% liked)

News

30499 readers
3131 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Madonna ‘Donna’ Kashanian, 64, was taken by plainclothes officers from her home in New Orleans

A 64-year-old Iranian woman, who has lived in the US for 47 years, was detained by immigration agents on Sunday morning while gardening outside her home in New Orleans.

According to a witness, plainclothes officers in unmarked vehicles handcuffed Madonna “Donna” Kashanian and transported her to a Mississippi jail before transferring her to the South Louisiana Ice processing center in Basile, reports Nola.

Kashanian arrived in the US in 1978 on a student visa and later applied for asylum, citing fears of persecution due to her father’s ties to the US-backed Shah of Iran. Her asylum request was ultimately denied, but she was granted a stay of removal on the condition she comply with immigration requirements, a condition her family says she always met.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 2 points 12 minutes ago

Wow what heroes, saving us from a little old lady.

ICE needs to be abolished.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

They have zero compassion, zero empathy, zero humanity.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 28 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What kind of gardening? Violent gardening? Was she sowing the seeds of discontent?

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 4 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

She was just gardening there! Menacingly!

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 47 minutes ago

She was gardening right at me!

[–] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 4 hours ago (6 children)

How can trumpers not see that ICE is pissing our money away just to torture good people?

[–] imrighthere@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

It's your money they're using, so why would they care ?

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

They enjoy the torment. They're sadists.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)
[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 26 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Trumpers only see Trumpers as "good people." if they could press a button and watch everyone around them who isn't one die in agony for the schaudenfreude of it, they would.

That's why they're trying to turn empathy into a character deficit and slur.

This is what separates them from everyone else. I'm an extreme leftist, something some low information Americans incorrectly paint as just as extreme as the MAGA cult, when I want that MAGA cult to have access to Healthcare based on need, higher Ed based solely on merit, conditionless housing and social supports, while they want me dead, and preferably painfully.

I pity them because they were made by for profit media propaganda meant to divide and profit.

[–] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

The really stupid thing is, this woman might have been pro-Trump, there are other minorities that are. Trump people are so short sighted.

[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The Trumper cult will hate and kill at any cost. That's their main MO, hatred and to inflict pain. They are 100% objectively bad people.

In a lot of situations there are just good people in bad situations, but no, these are, by any measure, simply bad (sub)humans. They are irredeemable sociopaths and a net negative on society.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They don't actually care about pissing money away. They enjoy good people getting tortured because they hate them and do not see them as people.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

They do see them as people, but specifically bad people. A non-person would be beneath their notice. A bad person on the other hand, becomes the target of their wrath and cruelty and it is justified to do this to them because they are bad.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 44 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I don't understand why they denied her asylum. The case seems really straightforward.

She wasn't a white South African. 😐

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 25 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Likely because her reasoning and fears were at odds with our geopolitics. It'd be like us accepting South Korean refugees for their fear of North Korean reprisal...if North Korea had largely been subsumed and the war was over for several years.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago)

She arrived before the Iranian revolution. Going back after the revolution with a Western education means at the very least she would have been deemed very very very suspicious. And why would a new paranoid religious government take the risk at all? Easier to purge.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Your analogy makes no sense. This woman came here in 1978 and the Shah was booted in 1979. It is entirely believable that she would have faced reprisals in Iran during the massacres of 1981.

I don't know why this woman was denied asylum but her request was well justified by events.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

She first came in as a student in 78 but applied for asylum later. And that kind of thing can take a long time to process, years even.

To put it more directly, accepting her request would be a tacit admission that US foreign policy made Iran a more dangerous place, not by accident, but as a side effect of its success.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

What are these immigration requirements? Surely if she breached them, it would be an easy thing to point out?