this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

Antisexism

379 readers
21 users here now

This community is about Antisexism, a joint movement of men, women and nonbinary people against gender stereotypes and all sorts of gender-based discrimination.

Here you can share useful materials (articles, research, statistics, opinions...) on gender-based discrimination against men, women, and nonbinary people, and participate in common discussions and activities.

Rules:

1. No promotion of patriarchy (or matriarchy)

Systems based on dominance of one gender harm everyone, including, often times, people in the dominant group. They are intrinsically sexist and therefore strictly forbidden in this community.

2. Be civil and listen before you speak

The issues of gender equality often come as contentious. Remember - there are no enemies here! The purpose of this place is to discuss and find solutions together.

3. Respect personal experiences

All of us have different history and issues regarding gender stereotypes. Every experience is valid! Don't try to belittle it.

4. Everyone is welcome!

Antisexism is about everyone: men, women and nonbinary, cis- and trans-people. Every group and every person individually have unique experiences that we need to address.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

It's fairly well established that feminism is broadly the movement to bring about the equality of the sexes (i.e. the movement against sexism).

Why does it feel like "anti-sexism" as a term might be born from a misunderstanding of feminism as being misandrist? I don't see any articles on "anti-sexism", anyone have clarity?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Broadly speaking, Feminism does mean to oppose sexism and level the field between men and women. There are of course going to be people, overwhelmingly men, who are opposed to that in the first place, but we don't care about their opinions right now.

Unfortunately, some people have taken to using the label of Feminism not to advocate for women, but to attack men. This comes in both the form of denigrating men as a whole and also attempting to erode their rights specifically. I don't think it's an especially large group, but rather is fairly vocal by nature and their message gets amplified by men eager to feel like they're actually the victims. Either way, it does somewhat taint the well of "Feminism" when a portion of it's purpose seems to just flip the oppression, rather than eliminate it.

Anti-sexism then is a more neutral term that doesn't have that "Us vs Them" mentality baked into it. It also has the added benefit of including advocating for those who don't strictly define themselves as Men or Women, being a term that opposed sex-based discrimination of all forms. Ideally, Feminism and anti-sexism would be basically synonymous, and in most use cases it would be understood to be. When presented side by side, though, the finer details will stand out more.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago

Near as I can tell, the basic point is that gender based discrimination and prejudice needs to be applied across the board.

Feminism focuses on the needs of women, and works to bringing women to an equal footing in all aspects of society. By nature of that effort, that doesn't include men's issues since social and cultural norms already have men at the standard of what we're all supposed to have.

However, there are still plenty of issues where prejudice, stereotypes, and harmful norms affect men. Anti-sexism serves to also work against those, as well as the issues of anyone that doesn't match the man/woman binary.

So, feminism would be an important aspect of anti-sexism, but not the entirety.

See, feminism does result in outcomes that benefit men as well, but that's a side benefit rather than the goal. With anti-sexism, it is a goal as important as any other. Since there's a synergistic effect, I might even argue that anti-sexism efforts boost feminism in a way that it can't reach on its own just by virtue of not having to be held back by slower progress in men experiencing the freedom that feminist thinking gives.

[–] profgrumpypants@midwest.social 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I feel like there's a very clear message here that people should be respected for who they are. Feminism as far as I know has two very separate major sects, but I also haven't studied it in a very long time. There's difference feminism which believes that there are intrinsic biological differences between the sexes, but that these differences do not equate to any being superior. Then there is equality feminism which focuses more on the fact that humans are a diverse range of individuals and that the best individual for any given task should be allowed to perform it.

I think a lot of feminism focuses on gender to be honest. Even difference feminist. I think a lot of that terfy stuff comes from that. But also all minorities tend to face adversities, and I think a lot of women feel that transwomen minimize their experience through existance? I don't know. I am not a terf. I can't really tell you, although I have mulled it over because some very intelligent people have a lot of anger towards transwomen (mostly, I said it before but I think a lot of people don't even think transmen exist or something).

Adding to the layers, non-binary people break their brains.

I think, as you can see over on the side - it looks like this place is for all folks and is trying to just create a safe space for people to explore and express themselves beyond their sex. Or as their sex. Just however they want. Feminism tends to be centered as a cis-ish woman-centric experience. This supersedes that.

Also if I offended anyone, apologies! Was just my take.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Hello from All - I can't speak on behalf of the creators of this community, but I'd guess it's a branding kind of thing.

born from a misunderstanding of feminism as being misandrist

That's a fairly common misunderstanding. For some people, the error is easy enough to explain away; others will be so bothered by the 'fem' part that there is literally no convincing them that feminism is NOT anti-male. Personally I consider those people to be a lost cause and not worth the energy, but if you wanted to sway them, your best bet would be to advocate for the concept of feminism without actually saying the name: then maybe you'll see some positive behavior change in things like voting patterns, all without needing to tackle the Sisyphean task of coaxing them outside of their comfort zone of ignorance or bigotry.

If an anti-feminist could be swayed into being anti-sexist, even if the fact that 'feminist' and 'anti-sexist' are synonymous is over their head, that's a win for human rights. ...even if the route to getting there is kinda stupid.

'a rose by any other name...'

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago

Like any word "feminism" is subject to fluctuating definitions. Historically, and currently on the academic level, feminism is indeed synonymous with anti-sexism.

However there is a wide range of people who use it to mean misandry. The gender wars narrative is becoming massive in the society.

The male side of it is widely spoken about, represented by Andrew Tate and such, but there is also a female side who unfortunately appropriated the name of feminism.

For a while I used Tiktok, and half of my feed was stuff like "men are useless emotionless parasites". I was definitely served that as algorithmic ragebait, but I wonder how many actually think like that.