this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
250 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

71955 readers
3264 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Uber’s use of dynamic pricing has led to higher fares for passengers and lower earnings for drivers, whilst increasing Uber’s share of revenue.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 99 points 4 days ago (4 children)

has found that Uber’s use of dynamic pricing has led to higher fares for passengers and lower earnings for drivers, whilst increasing Uber’s share of revenue

so, working as intended...

[–] MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

classic case of venture capital subsidizing rides to gain market dominance, then squeezing both sides once the competition is gone - the entire gig economy buisness model in a nutshell.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Enshitification is a nearly perfect process. We should not doubt it.

[–] bassad@jlai.lu 3 points 3 days ago

It's not enshitification as it was shit since the beginning : how this company was allowed to bypass workers protection laws (working time, minimum wage...), to burn investor's money with no limit and no real business plan (12 years burning cash without revenue) ?

Yeah people enjoyed their cheap ride, but now the cost is high.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Exactly, that would be the point.

[–] digger@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

But what about the shareholders?

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Of course it is. Textbook enshittification: first be good to your users, then to your providers, then fuck both and rake in the cash.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i live in a really great location for getting onto a bunch of different highways. because of this, ubers circle the area because they are closer to more things. it shows you the ubers in the area, and I will see like 8 or 9 going in circles, waiting. so i select the "wait and save" option on the app, because it's 3 dollars less and figure the wait won't be long because demand is low and there are plenty of drivers. nope. it literally just enabled a timer that didn't put my order through until it was over. it wasn't giving me a deal for being flexible with my pickup time, it was CHARGING ME 3$ just to have the privilege of them not withholding my service order arbitrarily.

fuck uber man that made me so mad

[–] erev@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

meanwhile i set a wait and save so i have time to finish getting ready and uber tells me it's already arrived.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 18 points 3 days ago

I’m sure this was a completely unforeseen outcome. Completely.

[–] witness_me@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Fuck uber.

I needed to take a ride from the airport to my home, and uber quoted me $150 for a 30 min ride. I jumped into a waiting taxi and paid $90 instead. At least the cab driver would see a good chunk of that money.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

Nobody said it was for drivers and riders. What a stupid article.