this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1126 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

7516 readers
582 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived Post

https://archive.ph/vzrga

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago

Hey guys, there is a lot of troll baiting in this thread. You've been doing a great job of not falling for it, so I'm not going to lock it. Newbies to this thread, check the times of when it was made and if it brings up the distant past a lot, those are good clues. Leave one comment at most to save everyone's sanity.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We've had first impeachment, yes. But what about second impeachment?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

We also had that! What about third impeachment?

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 16 points 6 days ago
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Not sure who still isn't getting this.

There is a literal American traitor in the Oval Office. One who has flagrantly violated the law, and specifically the Constitution, numerous times.

Impeachment is meaningless, as we've witnessed multiple times in American history. Impeachment is an acceptable process if the violation is minimal and not repeated. It's a slap on the wrist. A warning.

We are WAY beyond a symbolic slap on the wrist with no real repercussions. Impeachment is not a valid tool to use in a situation like this. At minimum, we are at the point where there needs to be massive protests like we just saw, repeatedly, until he is removed from office. If that fails, then there needs to be a general strike until he's removed. If that fails, then he needs to be removed from office by force.

If we can't manage these things, we will continue seeing the degradation of our freedoms, the collapse of our economy, the destruction of our founding document, signaling the end of our democracy, and the hole we'll end up finding ourselves in will be one we won't see this country come out of for the remainder of our lives.

It is time to remove this traitor and his treasonous enablers from their positions of power.

[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 8 points 6 days ago

They had a better chance of impeaching him for Jan 6th for actual insurrection than they do this time. Why? Because there are so many legal loop holes with the War Time Powers Act and the 2001 Authorization of The Use of Military Force. These loopholes were used by both Bush Jr. and Obama for various justifications for air strikes so the precedent is already there. Don't get your hopes up and chalk up it up political theater. It's also a distraction from what's going on. Thanks again to Twatter being that megaphone of "HEY LOOK OVER HERE!"

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

We haven't declared war since WW2. Everything has been AUMF, which can be done within 60 days retroactively. As always, the government is checks and balances, so if Congress refuses to exercise its powers and let the executive do whatever, it's a moot point.

I think it'd only lead to impeachment if Congress wants us gone within 60 days and Trump refuses, continues without an AUMF, and then Congress actually had the balls to push back at that point.

But if someone is more familiar with the legal processes involved here, please do correct me or add to this.

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago

Donny will never get out of this one!!!

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It worked so well the first two times. Why not try again?

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Third times a charm?

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Didn't they dangle an "impeachment" so many times the last time it literally stopped meaning anything? I see thru this game and I ain't buying it.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

This will totally work.

And yes, I know its bait.

[–] ALilOff@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

If we have to rely on the house or senate to impeach him, that’s not going to happen.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 165 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which the Democrats should absolutely fucking do regardless of whether The Republicans will vote to convict, which of course they won’t, but the point is, we can’t just sit back and do nothing. We have to at least show that we’re willing to take the steps that are necessary to dissent.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 98 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump has already been impeached.

Twice.

The last time he was president.

It doesn't matter anymore.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And became a felon after that.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Shortly before becoming president for the second time.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The cop at the protest yawns, unslings his 40mm LMT™ weapon, loads another rubber bullet into it, looks around the crowd for another reporter, aims, and shoots her in the head.

Idealistic youngling: "Wow, that cop just shot a woman in the head with a rubber bullet, he could totally be charged for that!"

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Americans are cowards. Period.

The constitutional right to be ARMED TO THE TEETH and they’re all pissing their pants in fear of… losing their jobs? They literally sat there, watched the worst of humanity seize power, and spent their political capital trying to limit their ability to fight back.

They deserve whatever they get.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wish I still lived in the fantasy world where this was plausible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 56 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That ship has sailed decades ago. The US hasn't been officially at war since 1945, and the congress has for all intents and purposes gave up on that power.

[–] falynns@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The speed Congress gave up their constitutional powers to avoid repurcusions for having opinions and voting for them is crazy. But I guess being able to give yourself a raise every year for doing nothing is tempting.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rpa@europe.pub 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I remember all it took was some jizz...

[–] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Now we have an actual cum stain running this shit show

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Who cares? He was inoeached before already and it literally did NOTHING

Wake me up when this bullshit is actually over, all this "oohh, THIS will end him for sure!" every week is tiring

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mrslt@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Oh, you mean like how he was impeached in his first term in office and nothing changed?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BubbaGumpsBackLumps@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Yeah lets impeach the already twice impeached president, surely third times the charm... right guys ?

/s

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago

Only impeachment that will matter is a vigilante with better aim

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

In 2001 when The US authorized use of force on Al-Qaeda that, along with The 1973 war powers resolution gave the president (as in the position of president, not just Bush) unlimited ability to bomb anyone loosely associated with Al-Qaeda in perpetuity.

It's what allowed Bush, then Obama, then Trump, and then Biden, and now Trump again, to use the military as they see fit for performing military operations against basically any state and group in the middle east.

This is sadly likely the least impeachable thing he's done in office.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›