this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
92 points (98.9% liked)

politics

22711 readers
208 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/41814981

NYC billionaires threaten to leave if progressive candidate Zohran Mamdani wins mayoral primary. But is their fear of losing wealth justified, or just a desperate attempt to maintain power and privilege?

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Now, if we can just push the same formula nationwide to get them to leave the country.

[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 50 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

Talk about laaaaaazy.

[–] DerRedMax@hexbear.net 33 points 1 week ago

Sounds like a great reason to vote for Mamdani.

[–] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago

What's next? Rent overcharging slumlords are going to threaten to sell all their properties in New York and leave?

[–] homhom9000@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wow. Now I wanna vote for Zohran

Edit: also like.. am I confused or is this just a race for Mayor? How much power does mayor's hold? Eric adams just walks around, takes pictures and joins podcast

[–] prole@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Got curious and did some research on what kinds of unilateral powers the mayor of NY has. I actually think this guy could do a shit load of good things if he really wants to. The budget is massive, like 100 billion. They directly control the heads of police, fire, health, etc. There are dozens of positions like this where they can freely appoint/remove people.

The city council can override vetoes, but it doesn't seem like they have an easy path to block the mayor from doing what they want if it's already within the scope of their power. Even the other elected officials who can reject budget plans and stuff (I forget the name, they have a lot of weird positions, comptroller maybe?) can just be ignored by the mayor. This happened not that long ago when Adams went forward with a contract with DocGo even though it got rejected. https://comptroller.nyc.gov/newsroom/mismanagement-of-docgo-contract-by-adams-admin-wasted-millions-of-dollars-on-unused-hotels-unauthorized-subcontractors-moldy-rooms-for-asylum-seekers-new-audit-from-comptroller-lander-finds/

However, I'm sure a concerted effort by local officials could really bog things down for the mayor if they wanted. The real problem will be the state government, they can step in at any point and stop whatever they want via legislation. Idk how conservative the NY state government is, but my guess is they'll be the main enemy of Zohran if he wins.

[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The current gov would certainly be a pain in his ass. For example, she has been an opponent of the NYC congestion pricing (an extra toll for cars entering lower Manhattan) and also an advocate for a mask ban.

The funny thing was she was trying to put hurdles on congestion pricing, then Trump said something against the congestion pricing and tweeted an AI picture of himself as king and she said "Trump isn't our king" despite being more aligned on this issue than not (and I am guessing aligned on other issues)

However, if Zohran wins I don't think it would be politically prudent to stand against some of his popular policies.

[–] prole@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

That last sentence is what I hope happens, but libs have short memories

[–] homhom9000@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Oh that's actually a good amount of responsibility.

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"If Mamdani becomes the mayor of New York," Ackman told The Free Press, "you're going to see the flight of businesses from New York... It only takes a handful of successful people to leave to decimate the city's tax base."

Capitalists love profits, they aren't going to shut down their businesses. And capitalists themselves don't consume too much (in aggregate compared to rest of the population) and don't pay taxes, they can leave if they want.

"I would spend far less than 183 days a year here, that's for sure... How can you compete against somebody giving it away for free?" he said, incorrectly suggesting that Mamdani plans to give New Yorkers free groceries.

The stores are limited, people will still go to closest store if they can afford it. Secondly, it's likely that the government-run grocery stores will run on low margins (but no deficits).

The main fear that many countries have of billionaires is that they'll run out of local currency and cause inflation (especially important for third world countries). But this is a city, not a country.

[–] prole@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Capitalists absolutely consume a lot. Idk how accurate the numbers are, but everything I've read about this suggests the top ~10% are responsible for nearly half of all consumer spending in the US. That number is probably higher in major cities where everything is more expensive and there are typically better public services.

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

True but I was referring to the top 1%

The New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants noted in an article last year that the wealthiest New Yorkers "go to great lengths not to get taxed as residents in the city"—often by ensuring they spend fewer than 184 days per year there, the threshold for being considered a permanent resident.

The organization detailed location tracking apps that help users track how many days they've spent in New York in a taxable year to ensure they can avoid paying income taxes.

The billionaire owner of New York's Gristedes grocery chain, referenced the 184-day rule as he told The Free Press he plans to go to "the promised land"—Florida—if Mamdani wins and moves to open low-cost, government-run grocery stores.

[–] SippyCup 18 points 1 week ago

K byeeeee. Don't get ass prints on my door.

[–] underisk@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If they’re dodging taxes then why would he care about them leaving? They’re threatening him with nothing.

[–] Monk3brain3@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Even by braindead capitalist principles this an objectively amazing outcome

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

Yes. Good. Okay. bernie-chair

[–] mrfugu@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago
[–] Rom@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago
[–] footfaults@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 week ago
[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

“I’m holding my breath until you give me what I want!”

Real mature, porky. Real mature.

@BillAckman are you positive?