this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
798 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

71537 readers
4070 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WhatsApp is rolling out ads. In an update on Monday, Meta announced that it will now show ads from businesses through its Stories-like status feature.

Meta says it will tailor the ads to your interests by using “limited” information, including your country or city, language, the channels you follow, and how you interact with ads on the platform. You can also change your ad preferences from Meta’s Accounts Center.

This isn’t the only change Meta is making to WhatsApp. The company will also start showing promoted channels when you click on the Explore button to find new ones to follow. It’s also rolling out the ability to subscribe to channels to “receive exclusive updates” as well.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Doctorow is always right.

[–] callyral@pawb.social 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I hate how my country (Brazil) depends so much on Whatsapp. If I could, I would uninstall that app immediately.

[–] rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 3 points 6 hours ago

Same thing here in Italy

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Explains why I've started seeing ads for WhatsApp, which was really bizarre

[–] dsilverz@friendica.world 20 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

@MazonnaCara89 The country I live in (Brazil) overly uses and depends on WhatsApp. From government departments to businesses and transactional relations, all the way to social and family affairs, people is addicted to it, forcing other people (e.g. me) to either have a WhatsApp account or ending up far beyond mere social ostracism (beyond mere loneliness): effectively, the inability to buy, sell, rent or even resolve citizen matters with certain government/state departments (such as receiving medical appointment schedules from Brazilian's public health system (Sistema Unico de Saude/SUS (Unified Health System) via their "postinhos"/"Unidades Basicas de Saude" (neighborhood public health centers)). They don't even use the grand old phone calling and SMS anymore: even "calls", when performed, are made by people/departments/businesses via Whatsapp VoIP functionality.

That said, it's worth mentioning that WhatsApp has been running ads for a long time: the "Channels" section lists seemingly random "channels", many of which are businesses with "verified" "blue badges". So it's effectively advertisement disguised as veiled "recommendations" from Meta. It seems like it'll just become worse (to the surprise of no one who understands what Meta is).

I really want to leave WhatsApp, but I'm socially compelled to stay (it's the only mainstream platform where I still have an account, against my will)... the raw, grotesque distillation from social compliance, worse than depicted in Derren Brown's documentaries...

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

jesus that some dystopian shit

[–] sunglocto@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

LET THE ENSHITTIFICATION BEGIN!

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Begin? 🤔🤔🤔

What year is this?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

i use none of these features.

i'm glad they are not as invasive as i thought, but they will definetly be making them worse over time.

[–] 0485919158191@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

OH whatsSNAP

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 24 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Repeat after me.... "Enshitification"!

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Is it really enshitification if it was shit to begin with?

[–] haych@feddit.uk 10 points 15 hours ago

Years ago before Meta bought it, it was good. So I think it kind of counts.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 6 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Never used it for personal ends. But I'm curious to see if all the companies using as a work tool will divert from it.

Signal.

And IF I learn how to run Jammi, it will be my default communication application.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago

the channels you follow

I knew they would use that info for targeted advertising

It's Facebook 101, let the users themselves tell you what they like

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 52 points 23 hours ago (10 children)
  • provide free app at a loss

  • grow massive user base and market share

  • squeeze your userbase for every cent they're worth

Every single time. We got to solve the funding issue some how, I dont want to live in a future run by ads.

[–] hiramfromthechi@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

WhatsApp was charging $1-$3 per year before Facebook's acquisition. They had 600M+ users and a team of twelve people. It was beautiful while it lasted.

Hopefully we can carry out the original mission with Signal.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's not just the funding, it's the business overall. Public companies need to show growing revenues year to year, and worse: growing revenues with a minimum yield. A product can grow by attracting more users up to a certain point. Then the only way to grow is by making more money out of the same users base. If the revenue is based on ads:

  • Extend the product so that the user's engagement increases (channels/others kind).
  • Add paying features (freemium approach, that includes blue stars or whatever the hell you want it to look like…)
  • Serve them ads

Freemium is not always working well and Meta never used it. They have no new great idea to extend the product without eating their other products users bases. So the only one left is more ads.

Funding is not the issue, for-profit companies are. Non-profit is the way to go. Federation is even better as individuals/families/small organizations can run their own servers.-

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I dont think its for profit being the issue. Companies making a profit is fine. Its publicly traded companies giving bad incentives.

[–] Susurrus@lemm.ee 10 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It's not very easy to solve the issue of infinite growth in a world with finite resources. The fundamental issue is that it's just not physically possible, but they keep trying. Either we continue this cycle and eventually destroy the planet irreversibly, or we acknowledge that maybe money isn't everything, and that maybe [the vast majority of] people aren't inherently egoitistical monsters, and we move on to different systems.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] FuryMaker@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

People are going to use whatever the majority use.

I need to ude WhatsApp when i travel to countries egere it's widely adopted. Just like I need tocuse Facebook if I want to partake in group chats with friends.

They're just too big. How is anything else supposed to take off? Just gradually maybe.

So maybe Signal will get there in a few years? What's itd adoption rate since it was created?

[–] network_switch@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago

It's a slow grind for adoption. I've had Signal installed on my phone since like 2016. Went from one person I knew to now about ~30. It's mostly people from work at tech companies but progressively I've noticed other industries employees adopting it for unofficial chat that my contacts list has been growing over the years. Probably won't take off in a few years. Maybe another decade

[–] camelbeard@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Family chatgroup, signal Work chatgroup, signal Half of my friends, signal

Won't be very long until I remove whatsapp from my phone. That one friend that doesn't want to switch, call me I guess..

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Gradually is the answer. You can dual use both Signal and Whatsapp. Same how you can use Lemmy and Facebook and are not limited to one sociale media app.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nothrone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

WhatsApp getting ads is great news! WhatsApp, and any other meta/facebook/for-profit-social-network will never be a good product. Therefore, the second best alternative is for it to be as bad as possible, so people finally change to worthy alternatives.

What is the alternative here? Don't know, perhaps Signal, though the devs are not welcoming at all. The UI is absolute shit. Looks like UI for old people, huge margins and empty space. My screen fits like 3 chats. A compact theme would take a few hours to create and vastly improve the product, but ya..

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

I know right? Why would I use signal? There's not even any games!

/s

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

My Signal screen fits 8 chats, and looks simliar to any other messenger I've used. It's a messenger app and the UI shows messages. I wouldn't want it to show anything else.

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 10 points 17 hours ago

Signal? Dude, I don't want nonstop getting updates about the war plans of the Trump administration ;-)

load more comments
view more: next ›