this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
231 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

71355 readers
3640 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Link to the article without the paywall

https://archive.ph/ieq1H

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 88 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Disney isn't fighting for the little guy. They will still agressively use it to cull their own workforce. They want to control who can use it and don't want to compete against an indie animation scene.

This is corporate AI against open source AI.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is corporate AI against open source AI.

Show me where I can download Midjourneys full model to run it locally and then we can agree to call it "open weights". Unless their base model and training data is also available, it's not open source.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

These lawsuits set precedents. The laws will apply to midjourney as much as the open source, but the big players can buy the data.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 58 points 2 days ago (7 children)

It’s hard to feel sympathetic for Disney when they have more money than god.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 28 points 2 days ago (3 children)

In this case that's exactly what we need, someone with more money than god that can set precedents to protect the authors and artists that need it the most.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 57 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Disney is not going to protect authors and artists.

[–] kenopsik@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago

Correct. If anything, Disney is only fighting somebody else exploiting their employees so they can protect their right to exploit their employees.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

American law works on precedents, this will be one

It doesn’t matter it was the evil empire getting that result

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It doesn’t matter it was the evil empire getting that result

It does if it only benefits evil empires. The open source tools can't afford the price which only leaves the big AI companies that can and Disney who holds the data.

All this will do is add a fat price tag and censorship. Artists will not get paid and AI will not go away, the jobs will still be lost. It's the worst of both worlds.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So you really think now that Meta pirated all possible books (and argued they just didn’t seed them) the normal guys will get the same treatment?

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Has someone sued Meta for that and has the court given a precedent?

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I understand. That being said, my feelings remain mixed.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago

Paraphrasing Churchill, if AI companies were plagiarizing hell's works I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil.

[–] die444die@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

And they just fired Terry Moran for the mildest tweet critical of the current administration imaginable.

I legit just cancelled my Disney+/hulu/espn account over it.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

everyone has more money than god though

[–] lmr0x61@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

Hey man, the only people who can challenge the new oligarchs, so it seems, are the old oligarchs. And I say: let them fight!

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

There are solid gold or platinum asteroids out there, but God only gave us the resources of earth in the bible.

So God is definitely richer than Disney.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Nvidia can do a hostile takeover of Disney if they wanted to

[–] fuzzywombat@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This could be the first sign of AI bubble bursting.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago

MORE!

Oh, I've been sued by Disney.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You know the timeline is absolutely fucking fucked when you want Disney to win a copyright lawsuit. 😬

We actually don't. This won't kill AI, this will mean only conglomerates like Disney can own AI.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 7 points 2 days ago
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 15 points 2 days ago

Link to the article without the paywall

New York Times Sues Fediverse Commenter for Copyright Infringement

[–] WhiteRabbit@lemmy.today 9 points 2 days ago

Very interesting time to be a lawyer.

[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

I'd say do it more... generate more star wars media until Disney gives it up as a golden goose to milk. Doesn't matter if it's ai or whatever fuck disney...

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is gonna be interesting. I really hope Disney wins. Then any artist can take this as a template to file their own lawsuits.

when disney wins there will be nothing left to sue, with the result that now the entertainment industry, which has the available training data, will also have the AI technology, and the only one who profits is disney - because in this situation all open source GenAI is fucked.