He'll never answer any question because it's an easy way to avoid being pinned down on any position, which makes him immune to all criticism (in his eyes).
this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
49 points (90.2% liked)
No Stupid Questions
41249 readers
1122 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Schroedingers grifter refuses to have his beliefs observed
Yeah, after watching his Jubilee session, Jordan's debate strategy boils down to..."I'd like to nitpick the definition of every word and supplant it with my own".
That's the grifters secret.
Grifters gotta grift
I've listened to Jordan Peterson a lot in long form conversations. This is my generous interpretation of his views.
Peterson believes that all humans have a hierarchy of values and desires.
Eg you go to work in order to get money in order to get food in order to live in order to play tennis in order to enjoy yourself....
At the top of this hierarchy is the thing that you're ultimately after in life. Jordan defines this thing as "god" and defines the pursuit of it "worship". Therefore, everyone has a god and everyone worships.
He also believes that the past doesn't really exist, as much as our societal memory of it. He would say that the story of Cain and Abel in the Bible is "True", because it is the archetypal brotherly rivalry that we all embody in some sense.
Putting this together. The Bible is "True". Everyone has a "God" they have a personal relationship with and that they "worship".
He is essentially defining things such that everyone is a Christian. Then he says that people just don't understand what Christianity really is.
He also refuses to admit that most Christians wouldn't define God in the way that he does.
Peterson is in practice an atheist that has successfully monetised right wing religious conservatives, and can't risk alienating that base by admitting that he doesn't have belief in anything close to resembling the way that they do.
He is essentially defining things such that everyone is a Christian.
My high school friend who became a religious weirdo, said to me that I'm Christian because I'm a good person, dosen't matter if I said that I'm Atheist. By that logic everything good is Christian because h label everything he found good as Christian.
his only purpose for the right is to draw in more socially/incel men to right wing circles, hes funded by russia. hes a propaganda mouthpiece, much like rogan and shapiro is.
I can't fucking stand Jordan Peterson, I've never seen him go through a whole debate without being a disingenuous, obnoxious prick. When he knows he's backed into a corner, he pulls out the reductio ad absurdum (what is "is"). The only other fake intellectual I hate more is Ben Shapiro and his "Gish Gallop".
What's dumber is the video origionally was called 1 christian vs 20 atheists, and you see in the video at least one atheist brought up the video title that they all knew before they started. (In other words, Jordan Peterson specifically volunteered to play the christian in a video that when he agreed to it was called, 1 christian vs 20 atheists) Then later demanded they rename the video.
But further its simple, JP preffers to attack people's specific stances, from a nebulous position where he never has to give his own stance because he can't defend his own stance.
Peterson retreats to a politically convenient solipsism whenever challenged on anything. He is not a serious person.
Succinctly put. In retrospect his behavior is classical grifting, but because he's so well educated in psychology and has spent decades lecturing students he's well armed to win over the 16-30yo disenfranchised/semi-intellectual male audience without them realizing.
His presentation of psychology leaves me with the impression that he is someone who is not well educated in the field. And I am saying this as someone with a background in a field that is very close to psychology.
His explanations of human experience and society rely on psychoanalysis and he only seems to cite more recent work when it reinforces his view point. His general approach to understanding human psychology is outdated.
<—-1800’s——psychoanalysis—-1900—behaviorism—-1950s——the cognitive revolution—-present day psychology—->
Petersons view of the mind and society is stuck in he past.
I can completely believe you - but this man is a certified psychologist and has lectured and even written psychology textbooks, right? When I watched a few videos in the past (circa 2017) to find out who this guy the alt right was falling in love with was, I took away from it that broadly he was a grifter selling himself & books, but as for his discussions on psychology I'm a layman so couldn't digest some of it. He sure does seem to think the world starts and ends with Carl Jung though, almost every problem had a solution that came back to a Jungian archetype.
I think that's a really accurate characterization. He has mastered the art of speaking without communicating.
JP is an atheist, but he recognizes the value in other people believing in Christianity. This is because the myths and symbols reinforce his worldview to people who (he views) aren't smart enough to get there with reasoning.
Also, like all Western Chauvinists, he can't let go of the idea of "Christendom".
He literally wanted to open a church and deliver servons every Sunday. He is not an atheist, he is just a charlatan.
Highly recommend anyone interested in him read this article / open letter written by an (ex) close friend and colleague, back in 2018.
JP expresses a belief in a deity.
That makes him a theist, even if that deity isn’t how we would typically conceive of god.
“God is conscience ”
"What do you mean 'belief?' What do you mean by 'in?' What does 'a' mean?"
That’s just his go to when he realizes he’s going to be mocked. Or he’s about to be proven stupid.
Guarantee you his definition of “god” would have changed had someone called him on his bullshit about Elisha or Jonah. (They expressed a view that one’s conscience is “the voice of god”… not god…)
"Oh, you're really something aren't you?"
"I am, and you're nothing, aren't you?"
Mr Smarty Pants got destroyed.
“I don’t want to talk with this guy!”
Fuck Peterson…. He’s a white supremacist.
"I don't like that question. I don't LIKE that question. I don't like THAT question...!"
Reading "god is conscience" in Kermit's voice was surprisingly hilarious
JP is an atheist
He won't readily admit to that either. He somehow sits in the void between atheists and theists.
Atheist is a bit of an stupid term anyway. It's like saying I'm non-golfer.
Agnosticism is a thing. He might be off in his own weird non-declarative void-like corner but the whole intermedium isn't like that.
Psedo-intellectual grifter
He's Schrodinger's Christian. Mother fucker is so slippery, getting a straight answer out of him is akin to trying to nail jello to a wall. Good luck.
I'm a Christian myself and have listened to a couple of Peterson's lectures on the Bible and I see him as someone who approaches the Bible with the mind of a conspiracy theorist or a New Age believer. He makes grand claims while using a handful of loosely related facts to support his beliefs and could care less about using a more rigorous approach. To him, any and all notable pieces of imagery in the Bible actually play important archetypal roles for fundamental principals in our grand cosmic reality
I believe JP has at the least strongly implied that he doesn't actually believe in the truth of the Bible, that he is agnostic towards an actual God, and that he instead uses Christianity more as a vehicle for understanding his own set of beliefs. So, to answer your question, you could fairly call him a Cultural Christian, but it would be very unfair to call him an actual Christian.
He is 100% a Christian - a rather devout and conservative one at that, he just doesn't like to admit it in public as he doesn't like to agree to any premise on anything he believes in, or really any statement he's made - as he'd then have trouble linguistically dancing around it when it was no longer convenient for whatever argument he was in.
If you've not read this open letter / article written by a colleague and (ex) close friend of Jordan's way back in 2018 I highly recommend it to everyone researching him. Though it is long it gives a lot of insight into who he is behind closed doors, and his aspirations.
It's an interesting enough read, however, the only thing I saw that was indicative of Christian belief was his desire to create and lead a church. However, plenty of cult leaders have already done the same. What makes him a real Christian and not just another brand of cultist along the lines of Mormonism or Jehovah's Witnesses?
I see JP's public presentation of Christianity as actively steering people away from what it really is. He focuses far too much on a mythologized, deistic form of Christianity and far too little on the beliefs that set Christianity apart. So, regardless of what he might think he believes in secret, I will continue believing, until things change, that someone who has intentionally given such a flawed interpretation for as long as he has cannot truly be called a Christian.
Fair enough. I don't see Mormons or Jehovah's as 'not Christians' though, nor do they as they believe in Christ as the son of their God - which is really all it takes to be a Christian fundamentally. However I do agree that the practices of the Mormon and JW church are very manipulative and controlling to their followers in the way cults often are, and overall a negative impact to the lives of most of their followers (except those at the top).
When people brand certain Christians as not Christian because they don't follow Christs teachings the way they believe they should be followed or by some other personal metric then it quickly becomes a 'No True Scotsman' situation.
Okay. So...lemme ask you....
Does that fact that there are an innumerable and wide variety of competing views and ideologies around the very basic teachings of one simple woodworker not tell you that it's all bullshit?...or do you think that YOUR concept of this religion's absurd and anti-factual claims are correct and its everyone else in the world who is wrong?
Not asking in disrespect, but asking of every christian.
And let's not even mention the fact that there are countless other ideologies that also claim to be the sole truth, and which one you subscribe to is heavily dependent on where you were born.
A lot of the New Atheists (and adjacent intellectuals) are doing this type of sophistry where they've doubled back on their old positions and claimed to be "culturally christian". It's partially an admission that they are uncomfortable with the direction secular, progressive society has taken in the past 20 years or so.
"Sophistry" is a negative word btw. Didn't think I'd need to clarify that but here we are.
I think it speaks to his style of arguing. He doesn't commit to anything, so he can't be caught in the wrong on anything. He's free to take pot shots at his opponents while never giving them an opportunity to hold him accountable for his wrongheaded BS.
It’s not odd. He’s a hypocritical grifter and should be ignored by all. The framing of this post is concerning. This is not a man people should listen to
I was just gonna go with “Who gives a shit?” but you put it better.
He’s an opportunist. A fraud.
He's a conservative. Conservatives cannot be held to any sort of philosophical or ideological consistency, because their positions on any issue are entirely negotiable. There are no fundamentally conservative values beyond "is this good for me?" That's why it's so appealing to conservatives to have a personal savior who fully accepts your apology and offers divine forgiveness for any transgressions.
Reducing half of the country’s population to a caricature like that is neither true nor helpful. Conservatives aren’t all the same - no more than Democrats are. You’d call them out for that kind of generalization, so you should hold yourself to the same standard.
I'm not reducing anyone to anything. Conservativism is always exactly the same, which is why it's called "conservativism." If a conservative isn't conservative, then they are something else.
It's not a generalization, it's the name for the phenomenon.
My understanding is that Jordan doesn’t believe the Bible is literally true, but rather metaphorically true - in the same way people believe a porcupine can throw its quills. It can’t, factually speaking, but if you live as though it can, you’re probably better off than someone who doesn’t and ends up getting too close.
Because Christianity is a 'Choose Your Own Adventure' religion and doesn't have a singular meaning. The various Bibles don't all agree on interpretation and even the four gospels each give differing accounts of Jesus' character.
I can't speak for him but lots of people follow whatever religion's values and may appreciate the metaphors of their sacred texts without engaging in the rituals or belonging to the religion as a community/organization.