this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
729 points (99.5% liked)

politics

23387 readers
3784 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During a Senate hearing to review the FBI’s FY2026 budget request, Director Kash Patel was forced to admit that, despite the law requiring it, he had no such request ready to review.

This surprising development came during an awkward back-and-forth with Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), the ranking Democrat and Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, which oversees and approves budget requests.

Senator Murray reminded the FBI Director that the budget request was legally required “last week,” and after the director responded, she surprisedly added, “And your answer is you just understand you’re not going to follow the law?”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 32 minutes ago (1 children)

This is what mediocrity looks like

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 33 seconds ago

Mendacity.

He knew. He didn't care. He just put out his hand and dared the Senate not to give him a black check.

And he's going to get that check, because Democrats more are terrified of looking obstructionist than of looking like they can't govern.

[–] kyle@lemm.ee 5 points 43 minutes ago

What does "legally required" here mean? I assume there's supposed to be a punishment?

[–] Neuromorph@lemm.ee 2 points 20 minutes ago

"I thought this was just a meet and greet"

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 36 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Fascists are inefficient.

He's probably waiting for orders on how to do it, like everyone waiting for Hitler to wake up before countering the Normandy invasion.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

And when Hitler woke up his first order was for breakfast and he chilled a bit before finally having his meeting. He misread the situation so fucking bad it is a miracle that even the enlisted men guarding him didn't scream at his face.

BTW. The Allies took into account Hitler's sleeping habits when timing their invasion. No joke.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 hour ago

I want to say he even habitually hanged/demoted/sent people who woke him to the Eastern Front.

He probably also fired the people who know how to make the budget in the first place.

[–] VampirePenguin@midwest.social 19 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Okay, so $0 for the FBI. Done!

[–] jagged_circle 9 points 2 hours ago

That's what Trump wants. Take note of the military and ICE budgets, however..

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

His name is Kash but he doesn't have any...

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Can't imagine how you'd expect an idiot like Kash Patel to do anything right at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if they’re advising agency heads to do this so they can fuck with the budget for their wealthy tax break bill?

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 26 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No, I think he's that dumb. Look at the lies the Bush Jr. team came up with before the Iraq invasion. Those were great lies; handcrafted with Old World dedication and aged in oak barrels until they were perfect.

These clowns are just incompetent.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

People need to drop the "they're incompetent" shtick if they beat you every time. Because if you get beat by people you think are incompetent, what does that make you?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 28 minutes ago

It implies nothing because it is not competence that is evaluated here.

Republicans beat Democrats because:

#1 A sizeable core of the American demographic cannot tell the difference between their elbow and a chair (too stupid) and are fearful of their own shadow

#2 The alternative, the Democrats, are almost as incompetent as the Republicans making the distinction moot.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 59 minutes ago

The side that isn't willing to shoot up schools

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

You can be great at one thing and an idiot at everything else.

load more comments
view more: next ›