this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
431 points (98.2% liked)

World News

46074 readers
2930 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At a secret workshop in Ukraine’s north-east, where about 20 people assemble hundreds of FPV (first person view) drones, there is a new design. Under the frame of the familiar quadcopter is a cylinder, the size of a forearm. Coiled up inside is fibre optic cable, 10km (6 miles) or even 20km long, to create a wired kamikaze drone.

Capt Yuriy Fedorenko, the commander of a specialist drone unit, the Achilles regiment, says fibre optic drones were an experimental response to battlefield jamming and rapidly took off late last year. With no radio connection, they cannot be jammed, are difficult to detect and able to fly in ways conventional FPV drones cannot.

“If pilots are experienced, they can fly these drones very low and between the trees in a forest or tree line. If you are flying with a regular drone, the trees block the signal unless you have a re-transmitter close,” he observes. Where tree lined supply roads were thought safer, fibre optic drones have been able to get through.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theblips@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Don't these reveal the location of the operator, though?

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

How? If you think they're going to successfully follow a filament thinner than human hair over 6 miles I'd love to know

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Ok, but then how strong can such a filament be? Seems like anything and everything could potentially severe the connection

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Since the filament is not under tension as it is unwinding I think unless someone intentionally cuts it or it jams somehow it should not jus break.

[–] theblips@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

I mean after the attack the strands left could be used to trace operation spots. But I guess you're right, I didn't realise they were that thin

[–] PoppyChulo@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 hours ago

Drop off this drone with a different drone. Then fly it out wherever the other drones couldn't get to.

[–] Tiger_Man_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Another proof that wired connections are superior

[–] theblips@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

Rhythm and fighting game players have known this for decades now

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago

Damn straight.

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago

I N P U T L A G

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Reminds me of those old torpedos where the propeller was powered by pulling a cable.

https://youtu.be/qvtZIdSI1Yk

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

There were some actual torpedoes that used miles-long wire to control

[–] childOfMagenta@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

I think they still do.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Those news are already not so new any more. We've had reports of those two months ago.

Since fiber optic wire guided missiles exist it's not that much of a leap to think it should work with drones too, so long as the weight works out.

Fiber is really really thin. 9 micrometer core diameter and 125 micrometer cladding diameter (incl core) and 250 micrometer coating diameter (incl core, cladding). The 10 km spools we use in our lab for network equipment testing are boxes of only like 20x20x10cm, and those aren't optimized to be extra small with bend insensitive fiber. I can totally believe the 1.2-1.4 kg for 10 km in the article.

Edit: leak -> leap

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 4 points 3 hours ago

Wire guided missiles have been in use since WWII.

Markus Reisner has a pretty good explanation of how they're deployed in one of his videos.

They have much shorter range so they basically set them up as ambushes. The wired drone gets hidden somewhere at a choke point. An other operator flies a recon drone at long range. When they report that a good target has come into range the wired drone takes off and hits the target.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

It's a flying nightmare, until somebody figures out how to cut the cable in flight.

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago

The way they're used there isn't much time for that. With regular drones they hunt around for something to kill and then dive in. The wired drones stay hidden until the target comes into range and then they just come out for the strike. The defenders only have a few seconds to react.

[–] CMonster@discuss.online 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Got to catch the thing first. I'm sure they are using fancier shit but I have an Avata2 that can hit about 50mph and is wildly maneuverable. I would be interested to the the specs on one of those. You would also need a pilot skilled enough to fly it. I think we'll start some type of micro-missile drone killer weapons in the near future.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What I'm imagining is more like a flying knife.

[–] CMonster@discuss.online 3 points 3 hours ago

flying knife missiles

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 17 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

this sounds so stupid but it might work

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They do work. They've been using them to blow up tanks.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

Sure. But it just might still work.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

At first I imagined the drone dragging its cable and that seemed terrible, but then I realized they’re carrying a spool and they let cable out as they go. That’s actually brilliant and absolutely could work. 12 miles of cable. Only thing is it adds weight so you can’t deliver as much explosive payload.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

Honestly, it's old tech. There were guide-by-wire missiles for a long time before this.

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 16 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I build some (they aren't in Ukrainian hands yet, but will be - if they want them, because they're advancing super fast and could be many steps ahead). There is no "might", they work.

10 kilometers of fiber weighs 1.5 kg, less if you buy fancier kinds of fiber. A drone with 10-inch props lifts this without problems. You can bend the fiber around a pencil and only experience degraded signal. Only a 90-degree bend will make it snap. In the war zone, landscapes after some battles already resemble "attack of the spiders" movies.

In peace time, the challenge is finding a farmer who allows using their field to test this. Promising to reel everything in and pay for damaged crops goes a long way, though. But sea is an even better idea - easier to reel it back.

P.S.

I am quite grateful to an Ukrainian radio amateur, Serhii "Flash" Beskrestnov. He published info about the early Russian models that were found crashed, and made a big deal about it, as one should. People listened to him and took him seriously, and started developing them ASAP.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago

bend the fiber around a pencil and only experience degraded signal

Interesting. Are you using G.657.A2 then?

[–] SirActionSack@aussie.zone 6 points 16 hours ago

Stupid like a TOW missle.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Like torpedos used to do.

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Next evolution, carrier drones. Larger fiber drones that carry smaller radio drones and can also act as a repeater when needed.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Already exist.

That was actually where my mind went first too. The big issue with current drones is signal strength and jammers. But if you’re able to just plop a wired signal repeater anywhere you can get a drone, then that solves a lot of the issues with signal strength. The article even mentions that these fiber drones are being used for forested deployments, where trees would normally block signals. But what if you just use the fiber drone as a repeater? Now you can send out your wireless drones without any of the issues of carrying a wire.

[–] madsen@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

"Carrier has arrived."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›