Enough is enough. President Donald Trump has openly violated the law by defying a direct order from the United States Supreme Court. This isn’t debatable—it is a blatant and unprecedented attack on our Constitution.

Kilmar Abrego García, a Maryland resident legally protected from deportation due to credible fears of persecution, was wrongly deported by Trump’s administration to El Salvador. García was immediately imprisoned in an infamous Salvadoran prison notorious for torture and human rights abuses. When the Supreme Court unanimously demanded Trump return García to the United States immediately, Trump flatly refused.

This act isn’t just unconstitutional—it’s criminal contempt. Trump has declared himself above the law, dangerously undermining the judiciary, the Constitution, and American democracy itself. If the Supreme Court does not act decisively, we risk permanently eroding the checks and balances that protect every American citizen from authoritarian abuse.

We must demand immediate action:

Supreme Court: Immediately issue a charge of contempt against President Trump.
Congress: Enforce this ruling vigorously and uphold constitutional accountability.
Citizens: Protest, call your representatives, and refuse to tolerate executive tyranny.

This isn’t partisan politics; it’s about defending democracy from authoritarianism.

Charge Trump with contempt. Enforce the rule of law. Defend our Constitution—NOW.

Originally Posted By u/Parking_Truck1403 At 2025-04-15 01:37:14 PM | Source

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

The time of charging him is over. It's time for a revolution and guillotine.

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

https://generalstrikeus.com/

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago

But if you THREATEN the Judge's Families you can LITERALLY do Whatever You Want!

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Who is Trump imagining he's jerking off in that picture?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 2 days ago

Double whopper supreme court with a side of fries, and one really shiny orange.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago

The Supreme Court didn’t rule that trump return him to the USA immediately, that is a lie.

They ruled that they have to do their best to facilitate the transfer of him back to the USA, which they say they are doing.

[–] Thunderbird4@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

By all means, be angry about this, but nobody will be held in contempt over this. The SC deliberately phrased it “facilitate” his return as a weasel word instead of “effectuate” like the lower court stated, to give them room to wiggle out of actually bringing him back without putting themselves in the position of having to do anything about it.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago

They can’t rule that they HAVE to get him back because he’s in a different country. What language the lower court uses is irrelevant.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

ⅎ 🜲