this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
176 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

71313 readers
3837 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 84 points 2 months ago (2 children)

using their face for verification

And here is where they underestimate how belligerent people can be.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 18 points 2 months ago

Then twins walk into the airport and the system crashes.

And facial recognition has been known to fail with very dark skin so that'll turn into a racial issue real quick.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 83 points 2 months ago (3 children)

passengers will also be able to upload their passports to their phone and travel through airports using their face for verification. Instead of manually checking in, which would let airlines know who intends to board their flights, airlines will instead be alerted when passengers arrive at the airport and their face is scanned

They can’t even reliably scan a QR code, how can they pull that off with 100% accuracy?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This also means people wouldn't be able to travel with cheap burner phones, which is extremely problematic for people who need to travel to and from increasingly authoritarian states.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It also means you are required to travel with a phone. Some people don't own a cell phone because they don't want one, need one, or can't afford one.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is there a lot of overlap between people who can't afford a cellphone and are taking flights?

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 10 points 2 months ago

Not a lot, maybe, but in cases where someone else is paying for the flight, there may be some. And there are a fair number of older people who may be able to afford the plane ticket, but carry a dumb flip phone because that's what they understand and can operate.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah anyone who travels with children.

[–] Paper_Phrog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That is funny.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 2 months ago

Pshaw! Who wouldn't want an expensive personal tracking and monitoring device?!

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think that's a feature, not a bug.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

Oh it absolutely is

[–] LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

TSA in the States has already pulled it off. they use sources they already have like your current and past passport and ID photos for verification and do not store the pic they take when crossing TSA. that's what the signs say at least. I guess it's good enough for them already..

[–] Rob1992@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yeaaah iirc they will forever keep the fingerprints of anyone that wants to enter the USA

[–] OverTheFiniteSun@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 months ago

I do not like this. At all. Facial recognition and forced digitization? I'm disabled, and when I request assistance, I literally cannot use a digital boarding pass. And the favial recognition just seems like such a breach.

[–] kurikai@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

Sound worse to me for the travellers and airlines

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 31 points 2 months ago

Ah, just the privacy nightmare we need.

[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 months ago

The whole thing is just security theater and rights violations. It's so stupid.

[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

Thanks I hate it

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago
[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Companies already issue digital boarding passes. I have a government issued digital ID in a phone app. These are convenient.

But facial recognition? Hell no, f that.

[–] kalpol@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Already here. It has been used in airport security lines for a few years now

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Doesn't change the fact that FUCK THAT

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago

Every bit of this sounds like it's own horrible idea and they just threw it all into one big horrendous pile of nonsense.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Valérie Viale, the director of product management at Amadeus, a travel technology company, told the Times that the changes were “the biggest in 50 years”. She said: “The last upgrade of great scale was the adoption of e-ticketing in the early 2000s. The industry has now decided it’s time to upgrade to modern systems that are more like what Amazon would use.”

Lmaooooo yes let's that famously consumer-first megalith as our baseline

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 16 points 2 months ago

Amazon of the "just walk out" shops powered by AI, that turned out to be s lot of Indian workers in the background.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I gotta travel with my twin more often. I can 50-50 unlock his stuff. Let's fuck this up.

[–] UnsavoryMollusk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Another proof that biometry auth is stupid

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

How delays and connecting flights are handled could also change. Under the technology being developed, passengers who miss connecting flights due to delays out of their control could automatically be sent a notification on their phones with details of their new onward flight. Their journey pass would automatically update and they would be allowed to board the new flight.

This is the only part of that whole thing that sounds any good.

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago

This isn't new though, I landed after a long flight last year and had a notification asking me to confirm rebooking to another flight because mine was delayed.

Turns out that no the flight wasn't delayed and luckily I mentioned it when dropping my bag because a person had to sort it out for me and rebooked me back on my original flight that was on time. So now I don't trust the technology at all.

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

It says "could" not "will", so they will just never implement that part.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

there's exactly nothing preventing them from doing that in the current system

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Yet another thing the Nazi's did, except now you're using computers. Fucking mind-blowing innovation.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Anal probes wouldn’t surprise me given how things are going

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago
[–] embed_me@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Didn't know there were snakes in the UN

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I've had it with these mother fucking snakes digitizing these mother fucking planes!

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago

The airport tried that shit on me today. I was able to make it print me a boarding pass, though.

I'm becoming a luddite in my middle age.