this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
333 points (96.6% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21442 readers
747 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 137 points 2 years ago (28 children)

/c/fuckcars : "use some other form of transportation!"

Also /c/fuckcars: "No! Not like that!"

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] FlashZordon@lemmy.world 81 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Must be lovely to hear your neighbor fire up their Cessna at 7 in the morning for their morning commute.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 38 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

Enjoy being stuck behind the asshole in a C130 with trucknutz.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IanAtCambio@lemm.ee 54 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Little known fact. Airplanes still use leaded fuel. I’ll bet that the blood levels for all of these families are elevated. Not a great place to raise a kid.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 38 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Clarification: Only piston aircraft require leaded fuel. Which is unfortunately a pretty big part of the general aviation market, but similarly sized turboprops do also exist (though are more expensive) and it doesn't apply to modern commercial aviation at all.

[–] Fox@pawb.social 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Further clarification: Only gasoline powered aircraft without the Auto Fuel STC require leaded fuel.

Although, there is an initiative underway to fully phase out leaded avgas. G100UL is the FAA approved formulation. Exciting time and long overdue.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

There are also some plans in the works to fully end leaded avgas in the 2030s.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I want to see a train-based one of these

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Everyone parks their personal train in their yard?

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah, or at least train cars, with a way to get it onto the network for vacations and such. (Vacationing in a personal train car sounds fun)

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is the future I didn't know I wanted. But it seems like a good way to make Snowpiercer reality in record time.

[–] Overzeetop@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

It's the present in the US. Many people own personal train cars, and you just contract with Amtrak to hook you up and you're off on vacation. You can even bring Babu. You can rent personal cars as well, though you probably should make sure yuor ocelot is housebroken if you're taking a rental.

Now, I say "many" but what I means is that's more than a few. Many is still probably in the 3-4 digit number (I'm guessing). And you'd be correct in assuming that it's not a luxury most people can afford. But it does exist.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was just googling around, and it looks to me like a private rail car costs something like a 2nd home, storage fees similar to property tax, $4/mile to have Amtrak haul you around. Basically a vacation home, but mobile. Definitely a 1% thing, but not billionaires-only. Probably way more prestige in saying you've got a private rail car than a beach house. At least among a certain segment.

Most interesting thing I've learned all week.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The logistics and cost of that does NOT sound fun. I'm pretty sure it would make the airport neighborhood look like a slum, based on the money needed.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Basically like an older industrial district with rail links to every building, but with houses instead.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Railroad suburbs exist! Streetcar suburbs as well. Was actually the norm outside of the city core until they started ripping up all the rail lines to build highways.

[–] Ginjutsu@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago
[–] ieightpi@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

this is quite interesting. but also these fuckers are pretentious

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

There are a bunch of these around. In my old city we had two nearby. One was nice kind of like this, one was just a grass field out by cornfields.

[–] awake01@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

http://www.casadeaero.net/text/about.php

Many pilots do this as a means of reducing the costs associated with operating out of areas with high hangar and service costs. This is Northwest of Chicago near Rockford. The about page explains a lot of the obvious questions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 13 points 2 years ago

"honey, Joe's wife is sick, can you take care of control tower duty today?"

[–] otacon239@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have a friend who lives in one of these neighborhoods but right in the middle of a city. Blows my mind that it was there the whole time and I just never noticed until I went to his house.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Where the hell am I supposed to put my boat?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quills@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This exists?! Oh my That's not just mildly, it's really interesting!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] smitty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›