this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
791 points (98.6% liked)

News

28372 readers
4612 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Russell Brand... Why is that name familiar?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 62 points 23 hours ago

It's always the ones you most suspect.

[–] tikifire@lemm.ee 50 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

This explains his sudden turn to Christianity last year. He's going to try the "God forgave me" defense.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 18 points 19 hours ago

it was pretty obvious when he started to trying to hide behind the pro-rape party of conservatives.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

More like "I can't be guilty of such a crime. I'm saved!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That’s very unsurprising

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

This is the guy we should be deporting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 19 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

after a police investigation into allegations made following the broadcast of a Channel 4 documentary

"The Crown Prosecution Service reminds everyone that criminal proceedings are active, and the defendant has the right to a fair trial.

Were the allegations not brought to the police before the tv documentary? Why didn't the police investigate before? If so there should be an investigation and prosecution of those involved in the "non-investigation".

This failure to investigate is an outrage, many people including me listened to Russel Brand in the 2010s, but the police failed to investigate and now has the gall to say "the defendant has a right to a fair trial"? Does the public not also have a right to a fail investigation and prosecution?

[–] CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al 1 points 12 hours ago

They may not have been, or the survivor may have not wanted to go to court so it went nowhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

He’ll be on Joe Rogan in about a month

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago

Freudian slip, but true nonetheless

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 324 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It's always the ones you most expect.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 102 points 1 day ago (11 children)
[–] noride@lemm.ee 80 points 1 day ago (4 children)

No way, there's absolutely nothing fishy going on with Leto. It's a totally normal, completely above board, women only island cult.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 247 points 1 day ago (8 children)

The moment someone starts going all "anti-woke" you know they've got something to hide and they are trying to get acquainted with the pardon-dealing industry.

[–] cucumberbob@programming.dev 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Pardon dealing industry? In the UK?

I’m pretty sure only 4 pardons have been given in the last 25 years. 1 was posthumous (Turing) and the other 3 were given to convicts who saved people’s lives while incarcerated.

I don’t think being anti-woke is going to help anyone get a pardon in the UK.

I do think it’s a grift, just not convinced it’s a grift for a Royal Prerogative of Mercy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 day ago

Yeah. Forcing himself on women was entirely consistent with his public persona, but shifting hard right just to seek cover makes it so much scummier.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 23 hours ago

I'm shocked, I tell you, shocked.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, I've seen this coming for a while now, but I must admit, I actually liked him once upon a time. His comedy specials weren't just funny, they made you think about the abstract ideas of religion and consciousness. He was like a handsome rockstar comedian, the sort of person I wish I could be. Smart, sexy, cool, interesting. Hell, when I got sober from alcohol, reading his book that re-imagined the twelve steps into something less religious actually helped.

But then I heard the rumors, and it kind of fit with the image he gave himself. And then he made that abrupt turn into right-wing conspiracy and that all but confirmed it. To be honest I thought he'd already been charged with something and had just celebrity-ed his way out of it. Sucks, man.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I loved Dennis Miller back in the '80s, before he made his heel turn into a right-wing douche. In retrospect, I realize I actually just liked the SNL writers coupled with his snarky delivery.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Hey, help is help, don't let his failings mean that your success is somehow tarnished. I get the sentiment as well. He was a little over the top for my taste but the reboot of Arthus he did still ranks pretty high on my list.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 88 points 1 day ago

"Rapist Russell Brand charged with attempted comedy"

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 140 points 1 day ago (5 children)
[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Okay but seriously… this actually has come up before though right? I distinctly remember there being major allegations against him years ago

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Check the date on that article, the joke is more layered than you thought.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago

Its always the ones you expect

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (6 children)

honest question here. unless there is video and audio proof. how the fuck could someone be charged for this 20+ years later over "he said she said"? like how the hell does that work. Could i just pick a random person and say they raped me in 2002 and then they will go to prison?

[–] jaek@lemmy.world 31 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Could i just pick a random person and say they raped me in 2002 and then they will go to prison?

Yes, that is how it works. They will be in prison the next day.

It's actually really easy. All you have to do is prepare some evidence, such as text messages and emails in 2002.

Then you need to have several really cool and chill interviews with detectives. You should get your family and friends to lie to the police as well -- tell them to say that you described the fabricated rape to them way back in 2002.

You should also make up some fake police reports from 2002 which were not pursued.

The real trick though is getting several other women to do the same thing.

Then yeah, the next day the police will arrest the person you've accused and they will be jailed without trial.

You're a fucking idiot.

[–] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

He was charged, not found guilty yet, a charge doesn't automatically mean you're guilty. You should wait for criminal proceedings to end before declaring he did it. So many people are quick to presume the guilt or innocence of people who were charged before they're even convicted.

[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 29 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Relax buddy. He was asking a genuine question, not doubting the victim.

[–] jaek@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it was a genuinely dumb question.

Edit: also, this wasn't a genuine question. Read it again, the poster makes a bunch of ridiculous assumptions to frame this as an absurd scenario. People who ask questions like this aren't doing it in good faith, and they should be told to fuck off with prejudice.

[–] Fluke@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You. I like you. Keep doing what you're doing. 💛

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, he's just asking questions, what's the big deal?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sk3rgi0@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago

Charged with rape again, right? Didn't we-the-people already cancel this idiot once?

[–] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Well as always, if he's guilty may he have fun rotting in jail and hopefully drops the soap, if he's innocent I hope he bounces back from such life ruining accusations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I can't believe I bought this guys book. WTF was I thinking.

[–] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

Dude has charisma and is skilled at improv. He had a story of overcoming addiction and had some good things to say about social issues back then. That kind of thing sells, so lots of scumbags put it in their bios.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›