this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
336 points (99.1% liked)

Bluesky

1458 readers
245 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 67 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 26 points 3 months ago

TI'm Cooked

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Bring back the golden age of the translucent/orange Mac all in one.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago
[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Isn't it a Charli XCX song?

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 56 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The solution is gonna be oldest in the book: layoffs.

The guy donates to the president and attends the inauguration, empowering a dangerous and irresponsible man. The president screws up the economy. And who ends up paying for it? Not Tim Cook but the employees.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tim Cook is a gay man. He may pay for it yet.

[–] Cruxifux 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So is Peter Thiel. They’ll be fine. It’s poor gays that have to worry.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When they run out of poor gays they'll have no use for the others.

[–] Cruxifux 6 points 3 months ago

I won’t cry any tears for Peter Thiel if the fascists come for him honestly

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

They still could feel their rights taken away. But yes, they won't be the ones I'll worry about.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I wonder if these companies are going to use their hitsquads to handle the situation or if they know something the entire world doesn't...

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

He spent a million dollars to curry favor with the man who's going to control a lot of their interests for four years.

I think the shareholders would agree that its a good bet.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 25 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The shareholders who, as a whole, just lost $250B? You think?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Let's be honest, if Apple didn't pay that $1m then the shareholders would still have lost $250B. $1m is nothing in this.

[–] Walican132@lemmy.today 17 points 3 months ago

Yeah scale. A million is like .001 billions. I would spend .001. Scale it down would you spend a tenth of a cent to possibly save $250? Yes.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'll toss this friendly jab, at the risk of offending SatansMaggotyCumFart:

At least you're not a total failure!

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't have a long list of enemies but you just made it on there.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I tagged you Fondant so I can remember.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 10 points 3 months ago

That's my evil twin.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip -3 points 3 months ago

Yes, hindsight is twenty-twenty, there was speculations about how Trump would implement the tariffs before he did it, and before it could be seen as taking the necessary steps to prevent the tariffs that Apple would be affected by, and bow it can be seen as it could have been worse.

As for loss of stock value, as long as the shareholders don't sell out of panic, they still have the shares and can recover their losses if the share price goes up.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 9 points 3 months ago

for four years

Someone's an optimist.

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So basically you’re saying he had to pay fief to the king.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

More like protection money to the mob boss.

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

They are the same picture...

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

"Trade wars are easy to win!" - some fucking jackass

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

250 billion ... so far

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Losing 250 billion in market value is not equivalent to losing 250 billion in cash. You only lose money in stock trading when you sell at a loss.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Unless you've used that stock as collateral for a loan, which billionaires love to do, because they always assume stock goes up and future them will pay the bill with less stock than today them would have to pay.

But woe be unto them if stock go down enough.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

The thing that constantly boggles my mind is that Trump could have extorted $50 billion out of the Saudis on Inauguration Day 2016.

I mean, Team Rocket could have figured that scam out.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Imagine wanting to save 2% a year in taxes so you light your business of fire

[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Some great investment opportunities coming over the next several months, good luck everyone.