this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
705 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

22153 readers
2708 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 19 hours ago

I wrote a shell script like this (it admin , notna dev) for private use.
The prompt took me like 5 hours of rewriting the instructions.
Don't even know yet if it works (lol)

[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 210 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tech guy invents the concept of giving instructions

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 109 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With clear requirements and outcome expected

Why did no one think of this before

[–] wtckt@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago

Who does that? What if they do everything right and it doesn't work and then it turns out it's my fault?

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 116 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It would be nice if it was possible to describe perfectly what a program is supposed to do.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah but that's a lot of writing. Much less effort to get the plagiarism machine to write it instead.

[–] orvorn@slrpnk.net 79 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Someone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a... code

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?

[–] maiskanzler 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We don't want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What, like some kind of design requirements?

Heresy!

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Design requirements are too ambiguous.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 18 hours ago

I'm a systems analyst, or in agile terminology "a designer" as I'm responsible for "design artifacts"

Our designs are usually unambiguous

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Design requirements are what it should do, not how it does it.

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

That's why you must negotiate or clarify what is being asked. Once it has been accepted, it is not ambiguous anymore as long as you respect it.

[–] drew_belloc@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This still isn't specific enough to specify exactly what the computer will do. There are an infinite number of python programs that could print Hello World in the terminal.

[–] drew_belloc@programming.dev 2 points 23 hours ago

I knew it, i should've asked for assembly

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think our man meant in terms of real-world situations

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And NOT yet another front page written in ReactJS.

Oh, well, that's good, because I have a ton of people who work with Angular and not React.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ha

None of us would have jobs

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 day ago

I think the joke is that that is literally what coding, is.

[–] Lime66@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Who even makes these comics? Is it like Simpsons

[–] zerofk@lemm.ee 16 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Randall Munroe. You may know him from such gems as xkcd 3472 and 6548.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 17 hours ago

Getting a bit ahead of yourself, we're only on 3070 so far!

[–] aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 7 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Web browsing 101: if you see a hyperlink on social media, you can click on it and then look around to see if it contains more links with useful information, often in the header or footer of the page. Here I found one for you: https://xkcd.com/about/

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Human communication 101: sometimes humans ask a question without expecting an answer, it's called a rhetorical question

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 16 hours ago

Sorry, I assumed this was a place of discussion and conversation. You can either be helpful or don't, it's generally considered a dick move to taunt while being helpful.

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

OP just chatting with themselves so they can screenshot it?

[–] Talia@feddit.it 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's just a fake conversation in general, look at the timestamps between the messages from the interlocutor. Several minutes to type a complete sentence?

[–] StellarSt0rm@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Hey, i can take a few hours to reply sometimes :c

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is some telegram group and both messages shows from left with profile icons(which got cropped). The screenshot person sent the last message which shows double ticks

[–] andrybak@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago

In the desktop client the positions of bubbles also depend on the width of the window.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Great attention to detail!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›