This will have literally zero effect. It was never about particular people, or “leaders”. This is honestly hilarious. But it absolutely tracks with the mindset of what the DoJ is turning into.
this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
48 points (84.3% liked)
politics
22634 readers
3854 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Court records show the Federal Bureau of Investigation worked with the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP), Canada, to execute a search warrant at Cottle’s residence
Bad Canada. Stop helping those who threaten you.
My understanding was that the group was fairly decentralized? I’m not sure how this might affect their operations.
Some people (officials, journalists) are incapable of grasping "decentralised" and quickly have to bridge the abyss that's opening in their minds, usually with something like "mentor", or "ringleader" or, in this case, "co-founder". I wonder how many "co-founders" there are: a hundred? ten thousand?
I wonder how many “co-founders” there are: a hundred? ten thousand?
How do we even decide this? The first X number of people to use the handle?
my point precisely
Anonymous isn't even a group. It's an idea, much like Antifa.
If they caught co-founder of the group, it means they are going after others too, and this might discourage others to continue their work.
Except they didn't catch the "co-founder" because there is no such person? Anyone claiming to have co-founded Anonymous is as full of shit as the media trying to portray it as such. Seriously, I would like to support this woman, but not in a way that denies reality.
I mean, theoretically all original anonymous members are co-founders
It's nebulous, bu at some point t it went from an idea to a hacktivist affiliation. Anyone who got on board with the idea before they did anything could be fairly called a co-founder
It shouldn't affect their operations much at all, but it might act as deterrent for people to join up or continue. Or keep evidence just hanging around.
Surely it's coincidence that the feds are after them when the last video they dropped pointed out election disparities in '24 and accused Elon of stealing the election.
There were hints of it before, too. Who knows why it wasn’t even explored before clown shit asshat took over.
We deserve the worst at this point.
I would very much like to know why the alt-right isn’t being absolutely destroyed on the tech front. Do they really have ALL the information security pros? I feel like if the resistance is dead-set on non-violence, cyberattacks, catfishing/exposing, etc. should absolutely be a priority, but I don’t seem to see anything taking place on that front.
Bro it is actually insane how many conservatives you could blackbag and disappear if you just Catfished them on Grindr. They'd never be able to admit anyone among their ilk ever got lured by gay sex into being bound, blindfolded, gagged, anesthetized, whisked off to upstate Vermont, and tossed into a wood chipper.
I dunno if I'd be able to jump or even haul a heavy conservative, but my ass is p fat and my mouth looks fuckable AF, and I would be totally willing to be the honey for this kinda trap.
I mean.... the wood chipper sounds like a more pivotal reason they won't tell their story.
Their colleagues trying to decry what's happening would be very hesitant to admit that the vector was through grindr
You are Anonymous!
If they work in independent cells, they shouldn't need a founder or co-founder to keep going.
Anonymous is a group?! I thought it was just that one guy, 4chan!
Real talk- I thought it wasn't a cohesive group and more a symbolic group. Like anyone could do some hacker stuff and claim to be "Anonymous". I mean, how would you know the difference?
Lol at cop founder
If they are so anonymous how did they knew who to arrest
It's hard to fully cover your tracks. Even harder to deny when you are successfully traced, then you are found to be in possession of things related to the crime. Like Luigi....wtf...he kept the 3D printed gun, he kept the manifesto, I mean step one you dump, destroy evidence.