Perhaps he should jump off a bridge.
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
337 points (98.3% liked)
politics
22612 readers
4039 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Along with his supporters.
Boo fucking hooo. He had no issues when "Judge" rubber stamp Cannon was handed the most important cases he ever faced and held up to her name, literally defending him as opposed to actually being a judge...
Crybaby "strongman."
Crybaby "strongman."
I saw someone else say "crybully" and I liked that phrase.
To quote a very wise lawyer, one famous in legal circles, "STOP BREAKING THE LAW, ASSHOLE!"
See, he ASSUMES there's "no way to win" and that this judge will always, regardless of anything else, strike down things because they're "against republicans/trump/whoever"
Why?
Because that's exactly what they would do, are doing, plan to do in the future, and can't imagine a world where someone else isn't just as shitty as they are.
Projection. Insecurity.
I mean, there's no way to win, but that's because this is one of those things that can't be ignored and absolutely should result in consequences. I'm not hopeful that real consequences will be had though.
When you've done the illegal thing it really cuts down on the number of winning options.
This exact judge previously shot down an attempt to obtain Trump's tax returns.
It's like he must be looking at something besides the caption to decide these cases. I wonder what that could be?? So mysterious.
"No way to win!"
Wild suggestion, but have you tried, I dunno, not flagrantly breaking the law and then ignoring the court orders that are handed down after breaking the law?
When Peter Navarro was in court for his treason, he would attempt to address the reporters every day, so he could beg for money. Every day, there was a woman who stood behind him, yellling or blowing a whistle whenever he talked, and holding up signs.
He's a short little dick, and she was tall, so he tried to yank a sign out of her hands, but she just held it up out of his reach, and said "Havent you committed enough crime today?"
Fucking HILARIOUS, and all in front of the media. The most effective strategy was blowing the whistle as he tried to talk, because it totally drowned him out. Most days he just walked away in frustration.
He really is the living embodiment of, "I've tried nothing, and I'm all out of ideas!"
Low-key starting to fear for that judge's safety.
I mean, my position is that if that fascists start offing Judges who are actually doing their job, it becomes open season on the overtly partisan fascist judges.
Yes, I understand what that means. But if we get there, I don’t think open warfare would be too far behind.
I wonder what's the American equivalent to polonium tea and windows
It's just getting shot. Americans aren't a subtle people.
Dont forget car accidents. Spontaneous car accidents.
Now for the news: The judge was found dead this morning after committing suicide by shooting himself in the back 14 times.
Police say he bound his hands and stuffed himself in a bag. He also left behind a note in dissimilar handwriting that stated "this was not foul play." Experts say professional stress can lead to these events, and it may not be the last time we see it. If you or a loved one...
Stochastic terrorism.
Sent to a school?
Break in gone wrong
One does not normally win a court case by stacking the deck in your favor with a judge who agrees with you, but by being within the law. Have you tried not being wrong? I hear that helps quite a bit.
Ok, I came here to say the exact same thing, but you said it much better than I would have.
I wonder where all the “Hilary used her own mail server” people are right now?
Laughing their stupid cunts off at having owned the libs, completely unaware of how fucked they are?
Privately laughing at you for thinking they give a shit about the rampant hypocrisy.
Half a meter up their own ass, explaining how the content shared "wasn't really war plans" so it basically doesn't count.
Yes, of course it's rigged. Truth has a well known bias towards, well, the truth.
Fucking crybaby.
He just needs it to get to scotus.
I actually like this one just as much but couldn't find it before.
Illustrators missed an opportunity to make his hands extra tiny.
And put him in black face because you know he doesn't have a problem with it.
Judge Cannon:
See also: Judge Kacsmaryk
If you don't break the law you have nothing to worry about. Isn't that what they like to say?
No way to win other than to NOT BREAK THE LAW in the first place.