this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
399 points (99.3% liked)

Linux

6530 readers
503 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m so tempted to do a charity program on my own and just receive 50k of these and put Ubuntu 24.04 or another user friendly Linux and drive around with my car trunk open and with a sign that says “free computers” while driving through New York

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

wouldnt it save you a lot of time and gas if you just left the car unlocked or even locked somewhere in NY?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Any organization that promotes Linux should find some of these charities nearby and offer to assist them in installing Linux distros that feel like Windows. We need not divert this into an argument over which ones are best. The point is that besides keeping a lot of hardware out of landfills it would help spread awareness of how user friendly Linux has become. I've been using Mint Cinnamon for over a month and barely notice the difference from Win10.

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 2 days ago

I really hope people decide to leave windows finally.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 123 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (10 children)

The right answer is definitely not landfill.

Most people use their computers to run a web browser, maybe a word processor or media player, and... not much else. Even someone who has only used Windows can figure out those basics on a Linux desktop.

If the charities are unable/unwilling to provide support for Linux, they could give computers away on Craigslist before dumping more e-waste into our environment.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 38 points 3 days ago (32 children)

The article mentions how basic programs are missing. They acknowledge the existence of FOSS alternatives, e.g. GIMP instead of Photoshop Elements, but complain about it being too difficult or that some alternatives are simply not to be found via Mint's "Software Manager".

Which is not news and probably one of the reasons why desktop Linux-based distros have still not become mainstream. There's just a lack of all that "user-friendlyness" less tech-oriented people need.

These things can be changed, although there is an economic barrier. FOSS projects are great and we see how many of them took off. However, if the main portion of users are not on Linux, but on Windoofs, then it doesn't make much sense to invest time and money into developing and maintaining software for Linux while having commercial interests.
The sad reality is that Microsoft has gained that market dominance. You won't get end-user oriented software companies on board with Linux as long as the user-share is so comparably low. This is a self-reinforcing cycle.

Windoofs meets UX needs and there is a lot of software people need -> most people use Windoofs -> companies develop and distribute for Windoofs -> people keep using Windoofs, etc..

To break out of that, people need convincing alternatives. Not just for Linux alone, but especially for the software running on it.

Which is hard to achieve, given how a plethora of Linux projects have to survive on donations alone and too few companies take the leap.

There is a silver lining though. With the Steam Deck and Proton, Valve really got a lot more people on board with Linux. I can only hope, that this trend continues.

But at the moment I fear that this will be short lived, especially with Microsofts "handheld Xbox" on the horizon.

So let's see, how this unfolds. The EOL of Windows 10 is really a strong incentive to switch to Linux. For my part, I will go for the full switch, since I've used Windoofs mainly for gaming anyway and am using Linux systems daily for my job. But then again, I am an engineering scientist and I can't picture, e.g., my parents being satisfied with a Linux distro.

[–] Silk@lemm.ee 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Getting radical, but software is another example of why capitalism sucks and how a socialist system could improve things.

In the domain of software design and distribution, when these things are run by companies that need to compete for market share and profit, then it just creates so much waste with needing everything to. be subscription based and filled with ads etc.

If we didn't have this ultra competitive market system, then people who are passionate about software could be paid to self organise around various projects and design things for long term use value and not enshittification.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 4 days ago

sounds like an easy choice

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 76 points 4 days ago (5 children)

That doesn't sound like a tough choice at all...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 51 points 4 days ago

Install Linux on them and give them to school children so they can go to school online and not have to worry about being shot. I also see a lot of lithium in that pile.

[–] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago (24 children)

How much ewaste has Microsoft caused just by wanting to sell more copies of the next version of windows.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›