this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
22 points (95.8% liked)

Opensource

1981 readers
75 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BB_C@programming.dev 3 points 6 hours ago

most Rust developers

survey participants != all rust developers

In fact, there is no reason for experienced Rust developers to participate in such surveys at all. I don't.

Hell, the way the survey results are covered (not just here) tells me that maybe we should push for it to never be done (officially) ever again.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Christoph Hellwig, who likened the addition of another language to a cancer and said that Rust should not be “anywhere near a huge C code base that I need to maintain.”

The article misquotes Hellwig who was against making the kernel a multi language project ie C and any other language due to the complexities that may bring. Not against rust per se. Jfc. It's like people don't read their sources anymore.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

While you are correct in that he was technically not objecting to Rust, specifically, that is out of his purview. The decision was already made so, he needs to get on board or move on with life. Adding to that, his objecting wasn't even to code that he maintains but a consumer of his API.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 1 points 49 minutes ago

Oh yes, it was just about what he said. Also I am excited about rust in the kernel. Just the article wasn't quoting him right.

Isn't worrying the defining feature of rustaceans? "Memory safe!"