this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
137 points (99.3% liked)

politics

20394 readers
3305 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Today@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

My fear half wants those people to go back to their jobs when they're asked. My anger half hopes they stay home, make popcorn, and watch with us as it all burns down.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 34 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Step 1 of Project 2025 is to fire all the federal workers. Step 2 is to replace them with Trump loyalists.

Problem is that Step 2 is fraught with so many natural road blocks that it's completely insane to think it could work. Hiring that many people all at once is nuts. Simply entering them into the payroll system takes effort. Oh, you already fired all the payroll entry people? How is that going to work?

Nope, they just drowned the federal government in a bathtub while leaving the tyrannical parts smoking a cigar the next room over.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Step 2 can take as long as they need it to take though. They never said replace them in equal number. Some departments won’t ever return. The IRS for example. Trump wouldn’t hire more. He just handed all the rich people the gift of cheating on taxes with no consequences.

That’s why Project 2025 is right on track.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

They're quickly discovering they need certain people. Like the nuclear oversight people they fired. They don't know what they are doing, and the plan cannot work.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The plan never said anything about efficiency. The plan is, sadly, on track.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 2 hours ago

But they do need certain things to work.

I think another poster may have the right of it. Step 2 was never expected to work, and the point is to destabilize the US.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

The plan is to destabilize the US, cuz the people in charge of the US are domestic enemies to the US and its constitution. (Yo military peeps - sound familiar? Do your fucking job.)

The 'scramble to rehire critical staff' bit is pure show. The point is for that to fail.

[–] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, they’re going down p2025 line by line.

This particular strategy of firing all feds and replacing them with loyalists simply doesn’t make sense UNLESS they’re for sure planning on squatting the WH long term. Otherwise, what would be the point of having a federal workforce full of trump loyalists after 2028?