Is this the new
e: just realized this might be considered 'lionization' which is not my intention
Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.
Rules:
Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.
Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 4: No sectarianism.
Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Is this the new
e: just realized this might be considered 'lionization' which is not my intention
Did they pick the most unflattering picture of the politician on purpose? LOL
It reminds me of this picture that I picked from some DPRK news publication:
lmao
Trump’s Alec Baldwin impression
I feel like Assad is a good benchmark. If this site allowed critical support for Assad, it must allow critical support for Luigi. It's not like Assad wasn't problematic in a million different ways
I don't think people understand the why of "critical support" here.
When people say "critical support of Assad", they are not saying "I want to live under the Assad regime" or "I agree with Assad's politics".
They are saying there is no alternative to Assad that is capable of resisting American imperialism to the same degree AND has good politics.
It's too late, you made him the chad, and her the soyjack.
More like
Yeah this is the biggest example of why the "pro-Luigi" adventurists are wrong. The biggest moron in Congress agrees with your theory of change. Take a good look in the mirror.
The biggest moron in Congress