There's been like 4 big budget attempts at making high fantasy TV series post game of thrones and none have been much better than alright. Idk if the genre just doesn't adapt to screen that well, if the writer's they're handed of to don't know how to write in the genre, or if there's a bunch of nepo babies in screenwriting who just aren't very good at writing in general.
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
13 points (88.2% liked)
Movies & TV
23086 readers
1 users here now
Rules for Movies & TV Discussion
-
Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
-
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
-
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.
Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Game of thrones was huge not because it had big flashy battle sequences and dragons but because it was a really intense political drama about flawed people abusing their power. Those stories are really hard to tell.
I think that's mostly it. You could replace the fantasy setting with squabbling nobles in Renaissance Italy, and if it leaned into the political intrigue / cloak-and-dagger stuff and was well executed , it could do great numbers.
Which ones are hard to tell, the dragon stories or the political dramas? For prestige TV writers the latter is probably easier because it's similar to a lot of things that's already in that the genre, and I think part of why the latter TV shows fails was because they tried to go for the game of thrones-y political drama angle when the source material doesn't lend itself to it.
It's the nepo babies in Hollywood lmao. Even the Game of Thrones showrunners are nepotism hires. Writing decent fantasy is fairly easy when you stop and take a moment to think about the implications of something. For example, if domesticated dragons are real, then they become WMDs and warfare is going to center around how to avoid their use and how to defend against them.
A lot of these failed projects aren't stopping to ask these kind of questions. Instead, they imitate successful franchises, eliminate the human storytelling, and create plot holes/remove the suspension of disbelief when they ignore how their fantasy world works.
Instead, they imitate successful franchises, eliminate the human storytelling, and create plot holes/remove the suspension of disbelief when they ignore how their fantasy world works.
Cargo cult shit
If you count Star Wars as fantasy, Andor could be an example of good storytelling
Also, I feel like GoT set an incredibly high bar that people (and cokehead producers) constantly feel new fantasy series need to clear. I think expectations are way too high. Not every show is going to be a global hit.
Sanderson is bland and boring. He sucks for the same reasons tv sucks.
He is also wrong about this, some of the best literature were serials, dune, the time machine, stranger in a strange land, etc. While the dune adaptation was what this bozo is saying would be better, and it is dogshit. So I say the problem is talentless hacks who think they can do better than original writers.
And that for some reason things intended for wider audiences tend to be watered down, there is probably some sort of censorship too.
While the dune adaptation was what this bozo is saying would be better, and it is dogshit
Bzzt wrong Dune movie was great. Second one was too loud in theaters and hurt my ears but the movie itself was great.
They might be referring to the recent tv mini series adaptation which everyone seems to not like much, I haven't watched it so no clue.
Nha it sucked, lame backgrounds, lame costumes, they whitewashed Islamic references, they changed characters, they removed the ecological themes, etc, they made it about democracy TM when Campbell was very antidemocratic.
I think Sanderson is neat! 